Skip to main content

Security report for juristsabc.lv

Jurists ABC SIA · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jurists ABC SIA is a Latvian legal services provider specializing in juridical consultations, litigation, and inheritance law. The company targets individuals and businesses seeking professional legal assistance in Latvia. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and provides clear information about the firm's mission, values, and services. The business appears to be a small but established local legal office with a focus on personalized client service. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 5.8.1 and employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swiper.js, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for security. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing purposes. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS, which are recommended to enhance security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy and cookie policies are present and indicate GDPR compliance, but no explicit security or incident response policies are found. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image with moderate technical maturity and a good security baseline. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy verification, but the site content and business information are consistent with a legitimate small legal firm. Strategic improvements in security headers, accessibility, and formal security policies would strengthen the site's security and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching juristsabc.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention juristsabc.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for juristsabc.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jurists ABC operates in the legal services sector in Latvia, focusing on providing personalized juridical consultations and litigation support. The company leverages a small business model targeting local clients with legal needs, including inheritance matters. The multilingual website suggests an intent to serve a broader audience including Latvian, English, and Russian speakers. The firm’s competitive advantage lies in its client-centric approach and professional team. Revenue streams likely derive from consultation fees and legal representation. The partnership with Pragmatik.lv for website development indicates a professional digital presence. Growth indicators include ongoing content updates and a clear mission to expand client base. No direct subsidiaries or parent companies are identified, indicating an independent operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 protects form submissions, reducing spam and automated abuse. The use of nonce tokens in forms adds protection against CSRF attacks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found. Privacy and cookie policies are present, supporting GDPR compliance, but no dedicated security policy or incident response information is available. The site would benefit from implementing security headers, regular vulnerability scanning, and publishing a security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jurists ABC SIA
Description
Jurists ABC - juridiskais birojs ar ilggadēju pieredzi, sniedzot konsultācijas dažādos juridiskajos jautājumos.
Key services
Juridical consultations, Litigation, Inheritance law
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.8.1, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Swiper.js, Modernizr, LazyLoad, js.cookie
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce tokens in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and functional with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional, relevant, and well-structured for a legal services firm.
  3. Multiple language options (Latvian, English, Russian) are provided.
  4. Contact form uses reCAPTCHA v3 and nonce tokens indicating security awareness.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked in the footer.
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  7. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  8. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and WordPress CMS.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. No social media official company profiles linked explicitly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.8.1 with a custom theme and uses a variety of JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Swiper.js for sliders, Modernizr for feature detection, and js.cookie for cookie management. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection on forms. Performance is moderate with some optimization possible. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). However, no advanced hosting or CDN information is available. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with juristsabc.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review juristsabc.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.