Skip to main content

Security report for jurists-advokats.lv

jurists-advokats.lv · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jurists-advokats.lv is a Latvian legal services provider offering a broad range of legal assistance to both individuals and businesses. Their services include family law, debt recovery, insolvency, criminal law, real estate, and inheritance law. The firm emphasizes over 25 years of experience and provides consultations both in-person and remotely. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and includes client testimonials and media partnerships that enhance credibility. Technically, the site is built on Webflow, uses modern web technologies, and incorporates Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Turnstile captcha for security and analytics. Privacy and cookie policies are present and indicate GDPR compliance. However, WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS and spam protection but could improve by adding security headers and incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jurists-advokats.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a trusted legal advisor in Latvia, targeting individuals and legal entities requiring legal support in various domains. Their business model revolves around consultancy, document preparation, and legal representation. The presence of media partnerships and client testimonials suggests a positive market reputation. The website links to partner domains specializing in family law and insolvency, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. The firm appears to be a small-sized entity with a focused service portfolio and a local market presence. The lack of explicit company registration or VAT information on the site is typical for small legal practices but could be improved for transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare Turnstile captcha to protect contact forms from spam. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with consent mechanisms, reflecting GDPR awareness. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and there is no published security or incident response policy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager introduces moderate tracking but is standard practice. Overall, the security posture is good for a small legal services website but could be enhanced by adding security headers, a security.txt file, and incident response contact details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Add an incident response policy or contact channel to demonstrate preparedness for security incidents.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize risk from vulnerable libraries.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
jurists-advokats.lv
Description
Plašs juridisko pakalpojumu klāsts - Parādu piedziņa, Maksātnespēja, Krimināltiesības, Laulības šķiršana, Darba tiesības, Ģimenes tiesības, Nekustamais īpašums, Mantojuma tiesības, Saistību tiesības un citi juridiskie pakalpojumi fiziskām un juridiskām personām.
Key services
Laulības šķiršana, Maksātnespēja, Krimināltiesības, Darba tiesības, Ģimenes tiesības, Nekustamais īpašums, Parādu piedziņa, Mantojuma tiesības, Saistību tiesības
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Cloudflare Turnstile Captcha, jQuery
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare Turnstile captcha on contact form
  • Consent mechanism for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookie Script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Clear focus on legal services for individuals and businesses in Latvia
  3. Multiple client testimonials and media mentions enhance trust
  4. Contact information is transparent and includes multiple channels
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit, limiting domain trust analysis
  7. No visible security headers detected, room for improvement
  8. Use of modern web technologies and captcha for spam protection
  9. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies including jQuery and Google Fonts. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cloudflare Turnstile for bot protection on forms. Hosting appears to be via Webflow's CDN infrastructure, ensuring good availability and performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and clear navigation. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no advanced security headers were detected, and accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, typical for CMS-based sites with external dependencies. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for the business scale but has room for security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jurists-advokats.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jurists-advokats.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.