Skip to main content

Security report for jungbunzlauer.com

Jungbunzlauer Suisse AG · Manufacturing · Switzerland

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jungbunzlauer Suisse AG is a leading manufacturer of biodegradable ingredients of natural origin, serving diverse industries including food, beverage, pharmaceutical, cosmetics, and cleaners. The company emphasizes sustainability and quality, positioning itself as a global leader in its sector. Their website reflects a professional and content-rich digital presence, targeting businesses seeking natural and sustainable ingredient solutions. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS and hosted on infrastructure likely provided by AWS, with integrations such as Google Tag Manager for analytics. However, the security posture is notably weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, which poses risks to data confidentiality and user trust. Privacy and cookie policies are well implemented, showing GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but requires urgent security improvements to protect visitors and maintain credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jungbunzlauer.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
18
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jungbunzlauer operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on bio-based ingredients, serving multiple industries globally. Their business model centers on producing high-quality, sustainable ingredients that enable customers to create healthier and safer products. The company maintains a strong market position as a leader in biodegradable ingredients, supported by quality awards and UN Global Compact membership. Their digital ecosystem includes customer support, downloadable resources, and career opportunities, indicating a mature and customer-focused operation. Partnerships with T-Systems and other entities are evident in their mail infrastructure. The company’s sustainability commitment is a key differentiator and growth driver. No direct revenue or financial data is available, but the scale and professionalism suggest a large enterprise.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, resulting in no HTTPS encryption. This exposes users to potential interception and undermines trust. Security headers are present but cannot compensate for the missing SSL. No incident response or security policy information is found on the site. The company demonstrates GDPR compliance through privacy and cookie policies but lacks visible vulnerability disclosure or security contact channels. The absence of OCSP stapling and session resumption further weakens security and performance. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues is critical to reduce business risk and comply with modern security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable and configure modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) to secure communications.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update security headers and content security policies to mitigate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Jungbunzlauer Suisse AG
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses TYPO3 CMS, a robust and mature content management system, indicating a stable technical foundation. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure, providing scalability and reliability. The site integrates Google Tag Manager and Google reCAPTCHA for analytics and bot protection, respectively. Performance data is unavailable, but the site includes responsive design and mobile optimization. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but present. The lack of SSL and TLS support is a significant technical debt and security risk. No broken elements or errors were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the technical stack is modern but requires urgent security upgrades.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jungbunzlauer.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jungbunzlauer.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.