Skip to main content

Security report for jung-und-schwanger.de

Bundesinstitut für Öffentliche Gesundheit (BIÖG) · Government · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

jung-und-schwanger.de is a German government-backed informational website operated by the Bundesinstitut für Öffentliche Gesundheit (BIÖG). It provides comprehensive support and guidance for young pregnant individuals and young fathers, focusing on pregnancy, childbirth, parenting, education, and legal matters. The site is well-positioned as an authoritative resource in its niche, offering telephone helpline services and online counseling referrals. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS and uses Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics. It is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with a moderate performance profile. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, anonymizes IPs in analytics, and uses a cookie consent banner, though it lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Overall, the site demonstrates a strong commitment to privacy and user support, with no adult or explicit content, making it safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jung-und-schwanger.de

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jung-und-schwanger.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for jung-und-schwanger.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves a niche government and non-profit sector focused on youth pregnancy and parenting support in Germany. Its business model is informational and service-oriented, relying on public funding and institutional backing. The target audience includes young pregnant women and men under 20, with services including counseling, education, and legal advice. The site leverages partnerships with related government and non-profit organizations to extend its reach and credibility. Its market position is strong within the public health information domain, with clear trust signals such as official logos and privacy compliance. The lack of commercial advertising or affiliate programs aligns with its non-profit mission.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and privacy-respecting analytics via Matomo with IP anonymization. The cookie consent mechanism complies with GDPR requirements, allowing users to opt-in or opt-out of data collection. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options is a minor gap. No incident response or security policy pages are published, which could improve transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the site balances user privacy and security well but could enhance its security documentation and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
  4. Enhance contact information by adding verified company contact emails for support and security issues.
  5. Continue maintaining GDPR compliance and update cookie consent mechanisms as regulations evolve.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bundesinstitut für Öffentliche Gesundheit (BIÖG)
Description
Informationsangebot für junge Schwangere und werdende Väter mit Beratung, Hilfen, und Informationen rund um Schwangerschaft, Geburt, Elternschaft, Ausbildung, und Rechtliches.
Key services
Information dissemination, Telephone and online counseling, Referral to local counseling centers, Support for young parents in education and employment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-out mechanism
  • IP anonymization in analytics
  • No cookies set without consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is well-structured and targeted at young pregnant individuals and young fathers.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are in place.
  4. No explicit or adult content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  5. Use of Matomo analytics with privacy-conscious settings.
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML but HTTPS is enforced.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published on site.
  8. WHOIS data is minimal but domain is consistent with German government health services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used open-source content management system, indicating a solid technical foundation. It uses Matomo analytics hosted locally in Germany, reflecting a privacy-conscious approach. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with features like skip links and alternative language options (sign language, easy language). Performance is moderate, with compressed CSS and JS assets. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but is likely a German technical service provider, consistent with the domain's WHOIS name servers. The site uses modern web standards and SEO best practices, including meta tags and Open Graph data. There is room for improvement in security headers and explicit incident response mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jung-und-schwanger.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jung-und-schwanger.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.