Skip to main content

Security report for jun88e.com

Jun88 · Other · Vietnam

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jun88 is an online gambling platform targeting primarily Vietnamese-speaking users, offering a wide range of betting and casino products. The company claims licensing from the Curaçao Gaming Control Board and features international sports ambassadors to enhance brand credibility. The website is built on WordPress with modern performance optimizations and provides comprehensive business and contact information. Technically, the site is well-structured with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and SSL encryption mentioned, but lacks explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trustworthiness. Overall, Jun88 presents as a professional and functional online gambling service with room for security and privacy improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jun88e.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jun88 positions itself as a reputable online gambling operator with a diverse product portfolio including sports betting, casino games, lottery, esports, and live dealer games. The business model relies on licensed operations, affiliate marketing, and user engagement through promotions and mobile apps. The company targets the Asian market, especially Vietnam, and leverages partnerships and brand ambassadors to build trust. Contact information and licensing details are transparently provided, supporting business credibility. The website's technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security practices. The absence of WHOIS data suggests privacy protection or recent domain registration, warranting further verification for high-value partnerships.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses SSL 128bit encryption, which is a positive security indicator. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML source. The site lacks a cookie consent mechanism, which is a privacy compliance gap. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present, indicating limited transparency in security operations. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, cookie consent, and public incident response policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  3. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and security readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing WHOIS information or using verified domain registration to improve legitimacy perception.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Cyber Lab B.V.
Registration number
166785
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jun88
Description
Jun88 is an online gaming and betting company registered in Curaçao, offering a variety of gambling products including sports betting, casino games, lottery, esports, and live games. It is licensed by the Curaçao Gaming Control Board and features international sports ambassadors.
Key services
Sports betting, Casino games, Lottery, Esports betting, Live dealer games, Mobile app betting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, GeneratePress theme, jQuery 3.7.1, ReactPress plugin, WP Rocket (performance optimization), Yivic Taodan plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of SSL 128bit encryption mentioned
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Vietnamese language.
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, indicating possible privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  4. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and performance optimizations.
  5. Contains detailed business and contact information including emails, phone, and physical address.
  6. Includes multiple external links to partner and related domains.
  7. Uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  8. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
  9. Security headers are not explicitly visible in HTML source.
  10. Website claims licensing from Curaçao Gaming Control Board.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress 6.8.1 with the GeneratePress theme and several plugins including ReactPress and Yivic Taodan. Performance optimizations are implemented via WP Rocket. The site loads jQuery 3.7.1 and Google Analytics scripts asynchronously. Mobile responsiveness and SEO metadata are well configured. However, no explicit hosting provider information is found. The site shows moderate loading performance and basic accessibility features. There is an opportunity to enhance security configurations and privacy compliance to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jun88e.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jun88e.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.