Skip to main content

Security report for jumpseller.com

Jumpseller · E-commerce · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jumpseller is an established e-commerce platform founded in 2012, offering a SaaS online store builder targeted at fast-growing businesses and entrepreneurs. The platform supports multiple languages and countries, positioning itself as a versatile solution for online retail. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear business descriptions and a 14-day free trial offer, indicating a customer-focused approach. Technically, the website employs modern front-end technologies including Bootstrap, FontAwesome, and Google Fonts, alongside robust analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Mixpanel, Facebook Pixel, and Visual Website Optimizer. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure, ensuring scalability and reliability. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, with good performance metrics. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements reCAPTCHA v3 for bot mitigation. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which could be improved to enhance trust. Privacy and cookie policies are not explicitly found, though a consent mechanism is implied. Overall, Jumpseller demonstrates a solid business and technical foundation with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jumpseller.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
98
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jumpseller.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
8,226
Employees
0
Customers
8,218
Third parties
8
Weak passwords
12%

2,066 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for jumpseller.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jumpseller operates in the e-commerce sector as a SaaS provider enabling businesses to create and manage online stores. Its competitive advantage lies in multi-language and multi-country support, appealing to a global customer base. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees and payment gateway integrations. The company maintains a broad partnership ecosystem, as evidenced by multiple localized domains. Growth indicators include a long domain history and active marketing via social media and analytics platforms. The business model focuses on ease of use and scalability for fast-growing businesses, positioning Jumpseller as a key player in the online retail technology market.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and bot protection via reCAPTCHA v3. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could expose the site to certain attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are published, limiting transparency. Data protection practices are not explicitly detailed, and GDPR compliance indicators are minimal. The extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools increases the attack surface and data privacy considerations. Overall, while basic security measures are in place, enhancements in policy publication and technical controls are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS infrastructure and prevent spoofing attacks.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  4. Establish and publicize a security incident response policy and contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jumpseller
Description
The e-commerce platform for fast-growing businesses. Start selling your products online today with a 14-day free trial!
Key services
Online store builder, E-commerce platform, Multi-language and multi-country store support, Payment gateway integrations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.1.3, FontAwesome 6.4.2, Google Fonts (Albert Sans), Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Mixpanel, Facebook Pixel, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA v3
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
AWS DNS (Amazon Route 53)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  • Content Security Policy not explicitly detected
  • No DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Mixpanel, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-997941181), Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Mixpanel, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO)
Marketing tools
Mixpanel, Visual Website Optimizer
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge detected
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found in the HTML content
  3. Contact email and contact form URL clearly provided
  4. Strong use of modern analytics and marketing tools
  5. Good multi-language and multi-country support indicated by hreflang tags
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business claims
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and robust technology stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, FontAwesome for icons, and Google Fonts for typography. Analytics and marketing integrations are extensive, including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Mixpanel, Facebook Pixel, and VWO, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Hosting is likely on AWS, providing scalability and reliability. Performance is moderate with preconnect and preload optimizations. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks a known CMS, suggesting a custom-built platform. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and missing DNSSEC, which could impact security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jumpseller.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jumpseller.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.