Skip to main content

Security report for jumppark.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website jumppark.cz currently presents a security challenge page that blocks direct access to its content, indicating the presence of a Web Application Firewall or similar security mechanism. The visible metadata and HTML content reveal legacy CMS technologies such as Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are outdated and pose significant security risks. There is a lack of visible business information, contact details, and compliance policies, which limits the ability to fully assess the business and its digital maturity. The security posture shows some protection via BitNinja.IO but lacks modern security headers and best practices. Overall, the site appears to be a small-scale operation with minimal content and poor user experience, compounded by the blocking mechanism that restricts full analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jumppark.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jumppark.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for jumppark.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain has been registered since 2014 and is hosted in the Czech Republic, consistent with the domain name. The absence of clear business identifiers, contact information, or legal disclosures suggests a low level of business transparency. The use of outdated CMS platforms indicates potential technical debt and security vulnerabilities. No evidence of partnerships, certifications, or marketing tools was found. The site likely targets a general audience but lacks clear business model or market positioning information.

Security posture

The website employs a security challenge page powered by BitNinja.IO, indicating an active WAF or security service to mitigate automated threats. However, the use of Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, both unsupported and vulnerable CMS versions, represents a critical security risk. No modern security headers or SSL/TLS configuration details were detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present, limiting the site's security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade all CMS platforms to their latest supported versions to eliminate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure regulatory compliance.
  3. Add clear contact information and business disclosures to improve trust and credibility.
  4. Enhance security posture by deploying modern security headers and enforcing HTTPS.
  5. Improve website content quality, mobile optimization, and accessibility to enhance user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Page shows a security check with automatic redirect and browser integrity check script, indicating a WAF or security challenge is active. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
Joomla!
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla! 1.5, WordPress 2.5
Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Browser integrity check script
  • Security check by BitNinja.IO

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked behind a security check page with automatic redirect.
  2. CMS versions are outdated (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) indicating potential security risks.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or business details visible on the page.
  5. Security check powered by BitNinja.IO is present, indicating some level of protection.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  7. Minimal content and poor design quality reduce user trust and experience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on legacy CMS platforms Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are no longer supported and expose the site to security vulnerabilities. Hosting is provided by cesky-hosting.eu, a Czech hosting provider. The site uses a security challenge page with JavaScript-based browser integrity checks and automatic redirect, which impacts accessibility and SEO negatively. No modern analytics, advertising, or tracking technologies were detected. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features, and the overall design and content quality are poor. Technical debt is high, and modernization is strongly recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jumppark.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jumppark.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.