Skip to main content

Security report for jumikis.lv

Latgales Jumiķis · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Latgales Jumiķis is a Latvian roofing materials and services company established in 2006, offering a wide range of roofing products, accessories, professional installation, and delivery services across Latvia. The website reflects a well-structured and professional digital presence with clear navigation and relevant content targeting local customers. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, service workers for PWA capabilities, and integrates a third-party financing widget from Elizings.org. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and advanced protections. Privacy and cookie policies are present, indicating basic GDPR compliance. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained with room for security improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jumikis.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing and retail sectors focused on roofing materials and installation services. It targets both individual consumers and businesses in Latvia, leveraging partnerships such as with Elizings.org for financing solutions. The business model is direct sales combined with professional services and delivery. The website content and structure suggest a stable local market position with consistent branding and customer engagement. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found. The company emphasizes quality, professional service, and broad product selection, positioning itself as a reliable local supplier.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and modern web technologies but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. Forms do not show explicit anti-CSRF tokens, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. The integration of third-party scripts and financing widgets introduces potential risk vectors that require regular security review. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could benefit from enhanced header policies, secure form handling, and published security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add anti-CSRF tokens and input validation to all forms to prevent cross-site request forgery and injection attacks.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing clear user data rights information.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Latgales Jumiķis
Description
Darbojas jau kopš 2006. gada un ir pierādījis sevi kā uzticamu jumta segumu pārdošanas uzņēmumu. Pie mums Jūs atradīsiet plašu jumtu un jumtu aksesuāru klāstu. Mēs piedāvājam arī profesionālu jumtu uzstādīšanu un piegādi visā Latvijā par saprātīgu cenu. Būsiet laipni gaidīti pie mums!
Key services
Roofing materials sales, Roof accessories sales, Professional roof installation, Delivery services across Latvia
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Flexslider, Skrollr, Service Worker, Elizings financing widget
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical link https://www.jumikis.lv/)
  • Service worker registration for PWA support

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Uses modern web technologies including service workers and analytics
  3. Includes financing application forms integrated from third-party provider
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
  7. Business information is consistent and professional
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a CMS platform similar to Duda (Multiscreensite), using JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Flexslider, and Skrollr for UI effects. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing. Service workers are registered for offline and PWA capabilities. The site loads multiple external resources from trusted CDNs and partners. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and form security need improvement to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jumikis.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jumikis.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.