Skip to main content

Security report for juliansalinas.ch

Julian Salinas Fotografie · Other · Switzerland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Julian Salinas Fotografie is a small photography business based in Switzerland, focusing on artistic and commissioned photography services primarily in Basel and Zurich. The website presents basic information about the business and its offerings, including art works, commissioned projects, exhibitions, portraits, and video projects. The target audience is general, including art enthusiasts and potential clients seeking photography services. Technically, the website is built using React and standard web technologies such as JavaScript and CSS. The site appears moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. There are no detected content management systems or third-party analytics or advertising tools integrated. From a security perspective, the website lacks visible security headers and privacy or cookie policies, indicating a low maturity level in security and compliance. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing immediate data protection concerns but also limiting user engagement. The absence of HTTPS information prevents a full SSL configuration assessment. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site content is fully accessible. Overall, the website presents a basic but functional online presence for a small photography business. Key recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding privacy and cookie policies, improving security headers, and providing clear contact information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching juliansalinas.ch

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in a niche local market providing photography and art-related services. Its competitive advantage lies in personalized commissioned works and artistic photography. The business model is service-oriented, targeting individual clients and art enthusiasts. Revenue streams likely come from commissioned projects and exhibitions. The website does not indicate partnerships or subsidiaries, suggesting a standalone operation. Growth indicators are limited due to minimal online presence and lack of marketing tools. The company appears to maintain moderate branding consistency but lacks trust signals such as certifications or testimonials.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic with no advanced security measures detected. The absence of security headers, privacy policies, and incident response information indicates potential compliance gaps, especially regarding GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the provided HTML content. The lack of HTTPS information is a concern and should be verified. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident. Overall, the security maturity is low, and improvements are necessary to protect user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including email and phone to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any vulnerable libraries or potential risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Julian Salinas Fotografie
Description
Julian Salinas is a photographer offering photography services including art works, commissioned works, exhibitions, reports, portraits, projects, and video. The website targets audiences interested in photography and art, primarily in Basel and Zurich regions.
Key services
Art Works, Commissioned Photography Works, Exhibitions, Portraits, Video Projects
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small photography business site with limited content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links explicitly present.
  4. Uses React framework with custom fonts and CSS.
  5. No security headers or advanced security features detected.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  7. No forms or data collection mechanisms found in the HTML.
  8. Content is in German with some English keywords.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a React-based front-end with custom fonts and CSS styling. The technical implementation is modern but basic, lacking advanced SEO and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no evident optimization for mobile beyond viewport settings. No CMS or hosting provider information is available. The site does not use third-party analytics or advertising scripts, which reduces tracking but also limits marketing insights. There is an opportunity to improve technical robustness by adding accessibility features, optimizing performance, and integrating SEO best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with juliansalinas.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review juliansalinas.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.