Skip to main content

Security report for juks.ee

Tugikeskus JUKS · Government · Estonia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JUKS is a Tallinn-based social and healthcare institution managed by the Tallinn Social and Health Care Department, focusing on supporting working-age individuals with intellectual disabilities. The organization provides a range of specialized care, social and work-related rehabilitation services, and training programs. The website reflects a government-managed entity with a clear mission and consistent branding. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with standard plugins and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and presents a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism despite analytics usage. Overall, the domain registration data supports the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the site.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching juks.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the government and non-profit sectors, providing essential social and healthcare services to a niche audience in Estonia. Its business model is public service-oriented, funded and managed by local government authorities. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized institution with a stable market position in Tallinn. Key services include special care, rehabilitation, training, and volunteer programs. The site’s partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified. The organization maintains a consistent brand image and demonstrates trust signals such as privacy policies and official domain registration.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and standard WordPress security practices but lacks several security best practices such as security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options). There is no visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page, and incident response contact information is absent. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking without a cookie consent mechanism, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in headers, privacy compliance, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR requirements given the use of Google Analytics.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to improve vulnerability management and transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide explicit contact details such as company emails and phone numbers to improve user trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tugikeskus JUKS
Description
JUKS is a social and healthcare institution managed by the Tallinn Social and Health Care Department. The center focuses on developing and maintaining the functional capacity of working-age people with intellectual disabilities.
Key services
Erihoolekandeteenused (Special care services), Sotsiaalne rehabilitatsioon (Social rehabilitation), Tööalane rehabilitatsioon (Work-related rehabilitation), Koolituskeskus (Training center), Vabatahtlik töö (Volunteering), Kingipood (Gift shop)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Simple Lightbox, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by Contact Form 7 and WordPress standard)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a public social and healthcare service center for intellectually disabled working-age people in Tallinn.
  2. Content is primarily in Estonian with language options for English and Russian.
  3. No visible email addresses or phone numbers explicitly labeled on the homepage; contact primarily via forms.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found despite use of Google Analytics.
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins like Contact Form 7 and Simple Lightbox.
  7. HTTPS is enabled with Google Analytics integration.
  8. No advanced security headers detected in provided data.
  9. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform version 6.8.1, utilizing jQuery 3.7.1 and Bootstrap for responsive design. It integrates Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking. Hosting appears to be managed by Spin TEK AS, consistent with the WHOIS registrar data. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important technical considerations for compliance and security. The technical stack is standard for a government-managed service website, with opportunities for modernization in security and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with juks.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review juks.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.