Skip to main content

Security report for jsdeliver.net

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website jsdeliver.net is currently a parked domain landing page with no active business content. It displays a message that the domain has expired and is available for auction through Dynadot.com. There is no evidence of an operational business, no contact information, and no privacy or cookie compliance mechanisms. The technical infrastructure is minimal, relying on basic JavaScript and advertising scripts from Google Adsense and AdsDeli. The domain is registered with Dynadot17 LLC since 2019 but is currently expired, which poses a risk of domain loss or hijacking. Security posture is weak with no DNSSEC, no HTTPS detected in the provided data, and no security headers. Overall, the website lacks professionalism, business credibility, and compliance with privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jsdeliver.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain appears to be inactive and used solely for domain parking and auction purposes. There is no business model or services offered on the site. The target audience is general internet users who might be interested in acquiring the domain. The domain's market position is non-existent as an active business. There are no partnerships or subsidiaries indicated. The domain is registered with a reputable registrar but is expired, which may indicate abandonment or transition. No revenue streams or growth indicators are present.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is low. The domain lacks DNSSEC, and the WHOIS data shows the domain is expired, increasing risk. No HTTPS or security headers were detected in the content provided. There are no visible forms or inputs, reducing attack surface but also indicating lack of active services. No incident response or security policies are published. Privacy compliance is minimal with only a basic privacy policy linked via popup. Overall, the site is vulnerable to domain hijacking and lacks modern security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Renew the domain registration promptly to prevent loss or hijacking.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms.
  5. Add clear business contact information and security incident response contacts.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be a domain parking/landing page with no active business content. It shows a message that the domain has expired and is available for auction at Dynadot.com.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Adsense Domains CAF, Dynadot DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, AdsDeli
Tracking pixels
youseasky.com, google.com/adsense/domains/caf.js
Marketing tools
AdsDeli, Google Adsense CAF
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain landing page with no active business content
  2. Domain is expired and offered for auction at Dynadot
  3. No contact information or business details provided
  4. No privacy or cookie consent mechanisms present
  5. Advertising scripts and trackers are present
  6. No HTTPS or security headers detected in provided data
  7. No forms or user input fields detected
  8. No social media or email contacts found
  9. Content is minimal and not professionally maintained
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and inline CSS with JavaScript for advertising and tracking. It loads Google Adsense Domains CAF scripts and AdsDeli ad scripts. The hosting and DNS are managed by Dynadot. There is no detected CMS or advanced framework. Performance is moderate but limited by minimal content. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta tags and structured data. The site is primarily a placeholder with advertising and domain auction links.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jsdeliver.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jsdeliver.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.