Skip to main content

Security report for jscom.agency

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website jscom.agency represents a newly established PR & Communications Agency, as indicated by the domain registration date in August 2023 and the minimal content stating the site is under development. The business appears to focus on public relations and communications services, targeting clients seeking such expertise. The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, utilizing standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery, with assets served from Tilda's CDN and Google Fonts. Mobile optimization is present, but overall content and navigation are basic due to the site's developmental status. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain status clientTransferProhibited, which provides some protection against unauthorized domain transfers. However, no DNSSEC is enabled, and no security headers were detected in the provided data, indicating room for improvement in security hardening. The absence of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as lack of contact information, reduces the site's compliance posture and trustworthiness. Analytics usage is limited to Tilda's own tracking scripts, with minimal user tracking observed. Overall, the website is functional but very basic, reflecting its under-development state. The domain registration is consistent with the business claims, and no suspicious patterns were found. The site does not contain any adult or questionable content and is safe for general audiences. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers and DNS security, and providing clear contact and incident response information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jscom.agency

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a small PR & Communications Agency, newly founded in 2023. Its market positioning and competitive advantages cannot be fully assessed due to limited public information. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on PR and communications services. The target customer segment likely includes businesses and individuals seeking PR expertise. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. The use of Tilda CMS suggests a lean digital infrastructure. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the current website content.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. HTTPS is enabled, and domain transfer protection is active, but DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There are no visible vulnerabilities such as exposed credentials or outdated libraries. Compliance gaps exist due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies and lack of incident response contact information. Data protection practices and security culture indicators are minimal, reflecting the early stage of the website and business. Incident response readiness cannot be assessed due to missing information.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website represents a PR & Communications Agency. The site is currently under development and contains minimal content. The tagline 'When PR means Pleasant Relations' suggests a focus on public relations and communications services.
Key services
PR, Communications
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 1.10.2, Tilda CMS, Google Fonts
Platforms
Tilda
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Tilda Stat
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Tilda Stat
Marketing tools
Tilda Stat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is under development with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses provided.
  4. Uses Tilda CMS and related CDN services.
  5. No security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. No social media or external business-related links found.
  7. Basic SEO and accessibility features present.
  8. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
  9. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with new domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Tilda CMS, leveraging HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and jQuery 1.10.2. Assets are served via Tilda's CDN and Google Fonts, which supports performance and availability. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. However, the site is currently minimal in content and structure, reflecting its under-development status. No advanced frameworks or backend technologies are evident. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts. Technical debt is low due to the site's simplicity, but modernization opportunities include adding security headers and improving SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jscom.agency. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jscom.agency.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.