Skip to main content

Security report for jri-america.com

JRI America, Inc. · Finance · United States

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JRI America, Inc. is an IT service provider supporting Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) Group, a major Japanese banking institution. The company offers business application services, managed services, and consulting primarily to financial sector clients. The website serves as an informational portal with links to parent and related companies, targeting financial institutions and IT professionals. Technically, the website is basic with legacy HTML and CSS, lacking modern frameworks or CMS. It is not mobile optimized and shows minimal SEO or accessibility features. Security posture is weak due to absence of HTTPS and security headers, exposing the site to potential risks. Privacy compliance is limited, with no cookie policy or GDPR indicators, though a privacy notice is linked to the parent company site. Overall, the site reflects a medium-sized corporate entity with moderate trustworthiness but requires significant improvements in security and technical modernization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jri-america.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as an important IT service entity within the finance sector, supporting a Fortune Global 200 banking group. Its business model focuses on internal IT services and consulting for SMBC Group entities. The website's linkage to SMBC and related domains reinforces its market position and partnership ecosystem. However, the lack of detailed business data such as founding year or size limits deeper analysis. The site targets financial institutions and IT professionals, with recruitment links indicating growth ambitions. The absence of direct contact phone numbers and limited social media presence suggests a controlled corporate communication strategy.

Security posture

Security maturity is low, with critical issues including lack of HTTPS, no security headers, and no visible incident response or security policies. The absence of cookie consent and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms further weakens compliance posture. No evidence of secure forms or data protection officer contact was found. These gaps expose the organization to risks such as data interception and regulatory non-compliance. The site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices, including SSL/TLS, security headers, and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all site traffic.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  3. Develop and publish a cookie policy and implement a consent mechanism if cookies are used.
  4. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Modernize the website for mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JRI America, Inc.
Description
JRI America provides IT services for Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) Group and its entities, supporting SMBC which is Japan's second-largest bank and a Fortune Global 200 company. Offices are located in New York, New Jersey, and Tralee (Ireland).
Key services
Business Application Services, Managed Services, Consulting
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is informational with no visible forms collecting data.
  2. No HTTPS detected in provided URL, which is a critical security issue.
  3. No cookie or terms of service policies found on site.
  4. Contact email is provided but limited to media inquiries only.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. Website design is dated and not mobile optimized.
  7. Links to parent company and related entities are present.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS. It lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features, which limits usability on diverse devices. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal data collection. The site performance is moderate but could be improved with modern technologies and optimization. Hosting and infrastructure details are not disclosed, and no CDN or cloud services are evident. The technical debt is moderate, with opportunities for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jri-america.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jri-america.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.