Skip to main content

Security report for jpoint.nl

JPoint B.V. · Technology · Netherlands

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JPoint B.V. is a specialized Dutch software development company focused on delivering high-quality custom Java solutions. With a team of 25 professionals, they serve clients primarily in the Netherlands across sectors such as banking, retail, education, and government. Their market position is that of a niche specialist with strong client references including ING, Rabobank, and Bol.com. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the website is built using the Hugo static site generator and leverages modern technologies such as Java, Kotlin, AWS, Docker, Kubernetes, and React. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though some accessibility features could be improved. No major performance or technical issues were detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data. However, it lacks visible security headers and formal security policies such as incident response or vulnerability disclosure. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing trust. Overall, the website and business appear legitimate and professional with a solid security posture but room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, adding cookie consent, publishing security policies, and enhancing accessibility to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
3/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jpoint.nl

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
3
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JPoint operates as a small-sized, essential technology company specializing in Java software development. Their competitive advantage lies in their focused expertise and strong client portfolio, including major Dutch financial institutions and retailers. The business model is service-oriented, delivering custom software solutions and consulting. Growth indicators include active event participation and a 12.5-year operational history. The company maintains a consistent brand and content strategy targeting businesses requiring specialized Java development. Partnerships with large clients and involvement in innovative projects position JPoint well within their niche market.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of security headers, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure policies indicates gaps in security best practices. GDPR compliance is partial, with a privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism. The lack of a published security policy or data protection officer contact reduces transparency. No critical vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small technology firm but could be enhanced by adopting formal policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR cookie regulations.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
JPoint B.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JPoint B.V.
Description
JPoint is a company of 25 top professionals focused on delivering high-quality custom Java software solutions that exceed user and client expectations. They emphasize passion for the craft, quality, and client needs.
Key services
Java software development, Custom software architecture, Frontend and backend development, Cloud and big data solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Java, Kotlin, AWS, Docker, Kubernetes, React, Vert.x, GitHub, AngularJS, Scala, Spark, Casandra, JBoss, Oracle, Elasticsearch
Frameworks
Hugo (static site generator), Swiper (carousel), Remodal (modal dialogs)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS base href (https://www.jpoint.nl)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. Focus on Java software development with strong client references.
  3. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance.
  4. No visible security headers or explicit security policies.
  5. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure policies found.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and address.
  7. No social media links detected in HTML content.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Hugo static site generator, ensuring fast and reliable delivery of content. The technology stack includes modern and widely adopted tools such as Java, Kotlin, AWS, Docker, Kubernetes, React, and AngularJS, indicating a mature and contemporary development environment. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site uses Swiper for carousels and Remodal for modals, standard JavaScript libraries for UI enhancements. No CMS vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and implement additional SEO optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jpoint.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jpoint.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.