Skip to main content

Security report for jotautomation.com

JOT Automation Ltd. · Manufacturing · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JOT Automation Ltd. is a specialized provider of advanced automation solutions focused on manufacturing industries including automotive, consumer electronics, renewable energy, telecom, and EV battery sectors. The company offers a broad portfolio of services such as assembly, testing, battery assembly and testing, custom automation, and material handling solutions. Their market position is strong, supported by over 30 years of experience and large-scale turnkey projects, serving a global manufacturing audience. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to B2B customers. Technically, the website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, and social media pixels. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO and basic accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness despite the professional website content. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers are publicly listed, with contact primarily via web forms. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website presents a credible and professional business front with room for improvement in transparency around security policies and domain registration details. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, and clarifying domain registration to improve trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jotautomation.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JOT Automation operates in a competitive manufacturing automation market, targeting industries with complex assembly and testing needs. Their business model is B2B, focusing on delivering turnkey automation solutions that improve manufacturing efficiency and quality. The company leverages its extensive experience and large project deliveries as competitive advantages. The website indicates a mature marketing ecosystem with integrated analytics and retargeting tools, supporting lead generation and customer engagement. Absence of direct contact details suggests a controlled communication channel, likely to qualify leads through forms. The missing WHOIS data is a notable risk factor that could impact customer trust and should be addressed promptly. The company’s social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, and YouTube supports brand visibility and industry engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No visible security or incident response policies, vulnerability disclosure programs, or security.txt files are present, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts introduces potential attack surfaces that require regular auditing. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices and publishing clear security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Audit and monitor third-party scripts regularly to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  5. Clarify and publish domain registration details to improve trust and legitimacy perception.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JOT Automation Ltd.
Description
We provide world-class test, production & custom automation solutions and equipment for smarter and more efficient manufacturing for various industries.
Key services
Assembly solutions, Test solutions, Battery assembly and test solutions, Custom automation solutions, Material handling
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Forms
Frameworks
HubSpot
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing, Cookiebot Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and relevant content
  2. Strong focus on automation solutions for manufacturing industries
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible; contact via form only
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is a significant trust concern
  7. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components. Marketing and analytics integrations include Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and Open Graph tags for social sharing. Performance is moderate, with video content and multiple external scripts potentially impacting load times. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. The absence of explicit security headers and WHOIS data are technical risks that should be addressed to improve overall site robustness and trustworthiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jotautomation.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jotautomation.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.