Skip to main content

Security report for josko.com

Josko windows and doors GmbH · Manufacturing · Austria

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Josko windows and doors GmbH is an innovative manufacturer specializing in windows, front doors, and interior doors, targeting a general audience primarily in Austria. The company positions itself as a medium-sized manufacturer with a focus on quality and design innovation. The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS and employs modern web technologies including JavaScript and jQuery, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. The site includes comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance and a robust cookie consent mechanism, reflecting a mature approach to privacy compliance. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is presumably enabled, no explicit security headers were detected, and no visible incident response or security policy information is provided. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable anomaly that impacts trust and business credibility scores. Overall, the website is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy, but could improve transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching josko.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Josko operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on building products such as windows and doors. Their business model is that of a manufacturer and supplier, serving both residential and commercial markets. The company leverages digital marketing and analytics tools extensively, including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Taboola, indicating a data-driven marketing approach. The lack of visible contact information and WHOIS data suggests potential areas for improvement in transparency. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand presence and targets a European market, primarily Austria. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies from the website data. The use of a professional CMS and cookie compliance tools indicates a commitment to digital maturity and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of detected security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces the site's security transparency. The extensive use of third-party scripts for analytics and advertising introduces potential risk vectors that should be regularly audited. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS registration details to ensure domain legitimacy and improve business credibility.
  4. Add visible and verified company contact information such as emails and phone numbers to facilitate customer and security communications.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking technologies to minimize security and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Josko windows and doors GmbH
Description
Josko is an innovative manufacturer with a unique vision for windows, front doors and interior doors.
Key services
windows, front doors, interior doors
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, JavaScript, jQuery Mousewheel
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Platforms
desktop, windows, chrome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • cookie consent mechanism
  • no exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Meta Platforms, Inc., Taboola
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Pinterest Tracking, YouTube Tracking
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Uses TYPO3 CMS with modern JavaScript libraries
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page
  5. No terms of service or explicit security policy found
  6. Extensive use of third-party analytics and advertising scripts
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and reduces trust score
  8. Website content is professional and business-oriented
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system, indicating a stable technical foundation. It uses modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery Mousewheel and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is optimized for desktop and mobile platforms with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and preconnect hints to external domains to improve speed. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph tags, and canonical links. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with enhanced ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from further optimization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with josko.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review josko.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.