Skip to main content

Security report for joppnet.de

Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.joppnet.de represents a small regional web agency based in Germany, specializing in professional web design, e-commerce solutions, SEO, and hosting services. The business targets local clients in Gera, Thüringen, and utilizes TYPO3 CMS as its content management system, with references to Magento for e-commerce. The site demonstrates good design quality and user experience, with a clear focus on business services. However, the technical infrastructure shows moderate maturity, with no advanced security headers or privacy policies detected. The domain WHOIS data is limited, showing an unusual domain status 'connect' and lacking detailed registrant information, which slightly impacts trustworthiness. Overall, the website is accessible and functional but lacks critical compliance and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching joppnet.de

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a service provider in the technology sector, focusing on web development and digital marketing services. Its market position appears local and specialized, catering to businesses and individuals seeking web presence and e-commerce capabilities. The business model is service-oriented, with revenue likely generated from project-based web design and hosting contracts. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies may affect compliance with GDPR, which is critical in the EU market. The company could benefit from enhancing transparency and security posture to strengthen market credibility.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture. HTTPS usage is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the provided data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, and there is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies. The lack of privacy and cookie policies further indicates compliance gaps. No forms or input fields were found to assess secure data handling. The domain's unusual WHOIS status and limited registrant data suggest a need for further verification. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement standard security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement standard security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS registration details to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency.
  5. Provide clear contact information including incident response channels to improve security readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Professionelle Webseitenerstellung mit übersichtlichen Kosten trotz bedeutender Referenzen. TYPO3 und Magento. Webdesign, E-Commerce, SEO. Gera / Thüringen
Key services
Webdesign, Webseiten, Webshops, SEO, Hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Magento (mentioned)
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by CSS classes and comments)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on TYPO3 CMS with Bootstrap styling
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found on the main page
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in the provided HTML snippet
  4. No social media links detected
  5. No security headers or advanced security features detected in the HTML
  6. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet
  7. Website content is in German and targets local/regional clients in Germany
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML snippet
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust open-source content management system, with styling and layout likely based on Bootstrap framework. The presence of Magento references suggests e-commerce capabilities or integration. Hosting is managed via DomainControl nameservers, a common DNS provider. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or caching. Mobile responsiveness is good based on CSS classes and viewport settings. However, accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal with only basic meta tags present. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with joppnet.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review joppnet.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.