Skip to main content

Security report for joonbot.com

Joonbot · Technology · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

73/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Joonbot is a technology company offering a no-code chatbot builder platform designed to help businesses improve lead generation, sales, and customer engagement. The website positions Joonbot as an easy-to-use SaaS solution with pre-built templates, integrations, and analytics capabilities, trusted by over 5,000 companies. The digital infrastructure is built on WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO, hosted on DigitalOcean, and integrates modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and FirstPromoter. The website is well-optimized for SEO, mobile responsive, and provides a professional user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and domain registration consistent with business claims, though some security headers and privacy compliance elements are missing. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained but would benefit from publishing privacy and cookie policies and enhancing security headers.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching joonbot.com

This scan found 16 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
Average
73

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Joonbot operates in the chatbot technology sector, targeting businesses seeking no-code solutions for customer interaction and lead management. Its SaaS business model relies on subscription pricing with a fixed rate regardless of audience size. The company leverages partnerships with platforms like Product Hunt and G2 to build trust and market presence. The website highlights integrations with popular tools such as Zapier and Google Sheets, indicating a focus on interoperability. Testimonials and client logos reinforce credibility. The company was founded in 2019, aligning with the domain age, and appears to be a small but growing player in the chatbot market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, preventing unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected in the HTML source. No privacy or security policies are published, and no incident response contacts are provided. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces tracking but is standard for SaaS marketing. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  4. Add explicit contact information including security incident response and abuse contacts to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Joonbot
Description
Create a chatbot in minutes with our no-code chatbot builder. Instantaneously improve your lead generation and grow your sales.
Key services
No-code chatbot builder, Lead generation, Customer engagement, Pre-built chatbot templates, Integrations with apps like Zapier, Google Sheets, Calendly, Analytics and targeting features
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Zapier, WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Yoast SEO plugin, Elementor page builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with delayed loading
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Segment (mentioned in content)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, FirstPromoter
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the scanned HTML content.
  3. Strong use of marketing and analytics tools indicating mature digital marketing practices.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage HTML content.
  5. Good SEO and structured data implementation via Yoast SEO and JSON-LD.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the homepage.
  7. Domain WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. Hosting is provided by DigitalOcean, a reputable cloud provider. The site uses JavaScript libraries for analytics and marketing, including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and FirstPromoter for affiliate marketing. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Structured data is implemented via JSON-LD for SEO enhancement. No broken links or errors were detected in the HTML content. Opportunities exist to improve technical security configurations and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with joonbot.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review joonbot.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.