Skip to main content

Security report for joomag.com

Joomag, Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Joomag, Inc. operates a sophisticated digital publishing and content experience platform designed to empower businesses and marketers to create, distribute, and analyze interactive content with ease. The company holds a strong market position with over 5,000 customers and millions of users, offering a comprehensive suite of services including creative tools, AI-powered content generation, content automation, and behavioral analytics. Their platform targets non-creatives and marketing professionals seeking to scale personalized content efficiently. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies such as Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, Cookiebot for consent management, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices, fast loading, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The presence of cookie consent and privacy policies indicates a commitment to privacy compliance, including GDPR. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable anomaly, reducing domain trustworthiness despite the professional appearance and strong business signals on the site. Overall, Joomag presents a credible and professional digital presence with strong business and technical foundations. However, improvements in security transparency and domain registration clarity are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching joomag.com

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Joomag is positioned as a leading SaaS provider in the digital publishing and content experience market, focusing on interactive and personalized content creation and distribution. Their competitive advantage lies in integrating AI-driven content automation and behavioral analytics, enabling clients to optimize engagement and ROI. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for platform access and premium features. The target customer segments include marketing teams, sales enablement professionals, and enterprises seeking scalable content solutions. The company demonstrates growth through extensive customer logos, industry awards, and a broad solution portfolio. Partnerships with platforms like Workable and presence on G2 indicate a robust ecosystem and market validation.

Security posture

The security posture of Joomag's website is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a public incident response or vulnerability disclosure page indicate areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration transparency but does not directly impact website security. Overall, the site demonstrates a reasonable security maturity level but would benefit from enhanced security best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish an incident response contact page and a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain trust and legitimacy.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance disclosures by detailing data retention policies and user rights more explicitly.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Joomag, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Joomag, Inc.
Description
Joomag helps companies easily create and deliver interactive publications from PDFs or templates. They provide in-depth analytics and behavioral insights to optimize content strategy, drive reader engagement, and accelerate revenue growth.
Key services
Creative Studio, Content Automation, AI-Powered Content Generation, Content Distribution, Privacy & Access Control, Email Marketing, Behavioral Analytics, Sales Enablement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, jQuery 3.5.1, Typekit Fonts
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Privacy and security policies publicly available

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot session tracker
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Comprehensive legal and privacy documentation is present.
  3. Strong branding and customer trust signals are evident.
  4. Modern web technologies and good performance observed.
  5. No security headers explicitly detected in HTML but HTTPS is enforced.
  6. No contact emails explicitly found in HTML content; phone numbers and addresses are present.
  7. No forms detected in the provided HTML content for direct contact or data collection.
  8. Social media presence is strong with official Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube links.
  9. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with georegion targeting.
  10. No explicit security incident response or vulnerability disclosure pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack centered around Webflow CMS, enhanced with Google Fonts and Typekit for typography, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics integration. The site is well-structured with responsive design, optimized images, and clear navigation. Hosting appears to be via a CDN, likely Cloudflare, ensuring fast content delivery. No major technical debt or obsolete technologies were detected. Performance is fast, and SEO best practices are followed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is good but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and semantic HTML enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 81/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with joomag.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review joomag.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.