Skip to main content

Security report for jonssonwallberg.se

Jönsson Wallberg Loss Adjusting AB · Other · Sweden

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jönsson Wallberg Loss Adjusting AB operates as an independent consultancy specializing in insurance loss adjusting, education, and networking services within the insurance sector in Sweden. The company positions itself as a proactive and reliable partner offering qualified specialists and interim solutions to insurance companies and professionals. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging WordPress with SEO and performance optimizations such as Yoast SEO and WP Rocket. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms, indicating a mature approach to privacy compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and incident response policies are absent. Overall, the business demonstrates legitimacy and consistency between its online presence and WHOIS registration data, supporting a high trust level.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jonssonwallberg.se

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets insurance industry stakeholders requiring loss adjusting and consulting services, offering tailored training and networking opportunities. Its business model centers on consultancy and specialist services, with a medium-sized organizational footprint founded in 2018. The website content and structured data reinforce the company's market positioning as a trusted service provider in Sweden. Partnerships, such as with the web producer Generation, indicate a professional ecosystem. The presence of a LinkedIn profile further supports business credibility and networking. Growth indicators include recent news updates and active content management. The company does not publicly disclose terms of service or security policies, which could be areas for future enhancement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, uses secure cookie settings, and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency in security incident handling. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, balanced by a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adopting additional security headers and publishing formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance and user trust.
  5. Enhance monitoring of third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve user data protection.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Jönsson Wallberg Loss Adjusting AB
Registration number
556934-3345
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jönsson Wallberg Loss Adjusting AB
Description
Oberoende konsulttjänster inom skadereglering, utbildning och nätverk för försäkringsbranschen.
Key services
Skadereglering (Loss Adjusting), Utbildning och rådgivning (Training and Consulting), Nätverk och resurser (Networking and Resources)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket, Google Tag Manager, Swiper.js, FontAwesome, LazyLoad.js
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure cookie settings (SameSite=Lax, Secure)
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is in Swedish with English alternate language available.
  3. Clear business focus on insurance loss adjusting and consulting.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism.
  5. No visible security or WAF blocking issues.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  7. Contact information is complete and clearly presented.
  8. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern plugins and libraries such as Yoast SEO for search optimization, WP Rocket for caching and performance, and Swiper.js for interactive sliders. It employs lazy loading for images and videos to improve load times and user experience. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessible navigation. Performance is fast, supported by minified CSS and JavaScript assets. The technical implementation reflects a well-maintained and modern infrastructure with opportunities to strengthen security headers and incident response capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jonssonwallberg.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jonssonwallberg.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.