Skip to main content

Security report for jokerweb.design

Joker Web Design · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Joker Web Design is a small, professional web design and digital marketing agency based in Lexington, Kentucky. The company specializes in creating custom WordPress websites, SEO, web hosting, maintenance, and advertising services tailored to both small and large businesses. Their market position is focused on local clients with a strong emphasis on personalized service and client collaboration throughout the development process. The website reflects a consistent brand identity with good content quality and positive customer testimonials, indicating a trustworthy and credible business. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and several modern plugins including Gravity Forms and WP Review Slider Pro. Hosting appears to be on Amazon AWS infrastructure, and the site employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. SEO practices are well implemented with comprehensive metadata and structured data. Mobile optimization and user experience are good, though accessibility features are basic. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics through MonsterInsights, with moderate user tracking. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA on forms, but lacks visible security headers and does not have DNSSEC enabled. There are no explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap especially for GDPR. The domain is privacy protected but registered since 2018, consistent with the business age and type. No suspicious or malicious indicators were found. Overall, the website is professional and functional with good business credibility but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and enhanced security headers to strengthen its security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jokerweb.design

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Joker Web Design operates as a local web design and digital marketing service provider targeting businesses in Lexington, KY and surrounding areas. Their competitive advantage lies in personalized client engagement, comprehensive service offerings from design to marketing, and a strong local presence supported by positive client reviews. The business model is service-based with revenue streams from website projects, hosting, SEO, and advertising campaigns. The company demonstrates growth potential through diversified services and a close-knit expert team. Partnerships with social media platforms and use of Google services indicate a modern marketing ecosystem. Strategic observations suggest focusing on compliance and security enhancements to maintain trust and expand market reach.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, posing regulatory risks. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the site. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires improvements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Establish clear incident response contact channels and security policies to improve security culture and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Joker Web Design
Description
Joker Web Design is a website design and digital marketing agency in Lexington, Kentucky that creates affordable, custom websites for large and small companies.
Key services
Web Design with WordPress, Custom Programming, Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Web Hosting & Maintenance, Web Based Applications, Website Advertising
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Gravity Forms, Google Analytics (MonsterInsights), jQuery, Swiper.js, WP Review Slider Pro
Frameworks
Divi Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Analytics by MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Professional local web design agency website
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap
  3. Good use of structured data and SEO metadata
  4. Multiple positive Google reviews embedded
  5. No visible security headers detected
  6. HTTPS enforced with valid SSL
  7. Use of modern WordPress plugins and themes
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Divi theme and several well-known plugins, indicating a mature technical infrastructure. Hosting on AWS DNS servers suggests reliable backend infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The site uses Google Analytics for tracking with moderate user tracking levels. Technical debt appears low but the lack of security headers and privacy policies indicates areas for modernization. Overall, the technical implementation supports business goals but should evolve to address compliance and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jokerweb.design. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jokerweb.design.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.