Skip to main content

Security report for johnsonjackson.com

Johnson Jackson PLLC · Other · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Johnson Jackson PLLC is a specialized labor and employment law firm based in Tampa, Florida, offering a comprehensive suite of legal services including litigation, defense against EEOC/FCHR charges, investigations, counseling, policy review, and training. The firm positions itself as a trusted advisor providing strategic defense tailored to employer clients. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content aimed at employers and businesses seeking employment law expertise. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics for tracking, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the absence of visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates room for improvement in security and privacy compliance. The WHOIS data is notably missing or indicates the domain may not be registered, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional appearance of the site. Overall, the site scores well on business credibility and content quality but should address security and privacy gaps to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching johnsonjackson.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention johnsonjackson.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for johnsonjackson.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm operates in the professional legal services sector, targeting employers needing employment law counsel. It holds recognized industry certifications such as Best Lawyers in America and Best Law Firms, enhancing its market position. The business model is service-oriented, relying on expert legal advice and litigation services. The website suggests a small-sized firm with a regional focus in the United States. The firm maintains active social media profiles on Facebook and LinkedIn, supporting its marketing and client engagement efforts. The lack of detailed WHOIS data and domain registration information is a notable anomaly that should be investigated further to ensure domain ownership legitimacy. The firm’s partnership with PaperStreet Web Design and Law Firm Essentials indicates a professional digital presence strategy.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS as indicated by canonical URLs but lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields are present on the homepage, reducing immediate attack surface, but the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking, but no cookie consent banner or GDPR compliance indicators are visible, which may expose the firm to privacy compliance risks. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which is a critical trust factor. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in headers, privacy compliance, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve site security.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner and update privacy policy to reflect GDPR and other privacy regulations compliance.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to confirm domain registration legitimacy and improve trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure no vulnerable libraries or privacy risks are introduced.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Johnson Jackson PLLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Johnson Jackson PLLC
Description
Johnson Jackson PLLC is a Tampa-based labor and employment law firm providing trusted advice and strategic defense to employers facing employment law challenges. The firm emphasizes knowledgeable, customized legal services and offers a range of employment law-related services including litigation, defense of EEOC/FCHR charges, investigations, counseling, policy review, and training.
Key services
Litigation, Defense of EEOC/FCHR Charges, Investigations, General Advice and Counseling, Handbook and Policy Review and Drafting, Training and Education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Slick Slider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich for a law firm
  2. No visible forms on the homepage or main navigation for direct contact
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected
  4. WHOIS data is missing, indicating potential domain registration issues
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Slick Slider for UI components. The HTML structure is valid with responsive design elements for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. No CMS or hosting provider information is directly detectable. The site lacks advanced SEO features such as Open Graph tags or JSON-LD structured data, limiting social media integration and search engine optimization. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA landmarks or enhanced semantic markup detected. The site is professionally designed but could benefit from technical modernization including SEO enhancements and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with johnsonjackson.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review johnsonjackson.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.