Johnson Jackson PLLC is a specialized labor and employment law firm based in Tampa, Florida, offering a comprehensive suite of legal services including litigation, defense against EEOC/FCHR charges, investigations, counseling, policy review, and training. The firm positions itself as a trusted advisor providing strategic defense tailored to employer clients. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content aimed at employers and businesses seeking employment law expertise. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics for tracking, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the absence of visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates room for improvement in security and privacy compliance. The WHOIS data is notably missing or indicates the domain may not be registered, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional appearance of the site. Overall, the site scores well on business credibility and content quality but should address security and privacy gaps to enhance trust and compliance.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention johnsonjackson.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for johnsonjackson.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The firm operates in the professional legal services sector, targeting employers needing employment law counsel. It holds recognized industry certifications such as Best Lawyers in America and Best Law Firms, enhancing its market position. The business model is service-oriented, relying on expert legal advice and litigation services. The website suggests a small-sized firm with a regional focus in the United States. The firm maintains active social media profiles on Facebook and LinkedIn, supporting its marketing and client engagement efforts. The lack of detailed WHOIS data and domain registration information is a notable anomaly that should be investigated further to ensure domain ownership legitimacy. The firm’s partnership with PaperStreet Web Design and Law Firm Essentials indicates a professional digital presence strategy.
Security posture
The website enforces HTTPS as indicated by canonical URLs but lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields are present on the homepage, reducing immediate attack surface, but the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking, but no cookie consent banner or GDPR compliance indicators are visible, which may expose the firm to privacy compliance risks. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which is a critical trust factor. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in headers, privacy compliance, and incident response readiness.
Recommendations
Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve site security.
Add a visible cookie consent banner and update privacy policy to reflect GDPR and other privacy regulations compliance.
Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to confirm domain registration legitimacy and improve trustworthiness.
Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure no vulnerable libraries or privacy risks are introduced.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Johnson Jackson PLLC
Description
Johnson Jackson PLLC is a Tampa-based labor and employment law firm providing trusted advice and strategic defense to employers facing employment law challenges. The firm emphasizes knowledgeable, customized legal services and offers a range of employment law-related services including litigation, defense of EEOC/FCHR charges, investigations, counseling, policy review, and training.
Key services
Litigation, Defense of EEOC/FCHR Charges, Investigations, General Advice and Counseling, Handbook and Policy Review and Drafting, Training and Education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Slick Slider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is professionally designed and content-rich for a law firm
No visible forms on the homepage or main navigation for direct contact
No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected
WHOIS data is missing, indicating potential domain registration issues
Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn
Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking
No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Slick Slider for UI components. The HTML structure is valid with responsive design elements for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. No CMS or hosting provider information is directly detectable. The site lacks advanced SEO features such as Open Graph tags or JSON-LD structured data, limiting social media integration and search engine optimization. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA landmarks or enhanced semantic markup detected. The site is professionally designed but could benefit from technical modernization including SEO enhancements and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with johnsonjackson.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review johnsonjackson.com.