Skip to main content

Security report for jobs.one

group.one · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

group.one is a large technology company operating primarily in the DACH region, providing a broad range of IT services including domain registration, web hosting, cloud servers, digital marketing, and SaaS solutions. The company supports over 1,300 employees and serves more than one million customers through multiple brands. Their market position is strong with a diversified portfolio of partner brands and a focus on customer success and team development. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including a Teamtailor recruitment widget and a consent management platform, but lacks a valid SSL certificate and several security best practices, which impacts the overall security posture. The cookie consent mechanism and privacy notice indicate good GDPR compliance, but the absence of security policies and incident response information suggests room for improvement in security governance. Overall, the website is professionally designed with good user experience and trust indicators, but the technical security gaps present a moderate risk that should be addressed.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jobs.one

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jobs.one, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for jobs.one right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a multi-brand IT services business model targeting customers in the DACH region, leveraging partnerships with various hosting and service providers. Their competitive advantage lies in their broad service offering, strong regional presence, and a large motivated workforce. Revenue streams likely include domain sales, hosting subscriptions, cloud services, and SaaS products. The target customer segments include businesses and resellers needing online presence and cloud infrastructure. Growth indicators include a large employee base and multiple awards such as the kununu Top Company 2025 badge. The partnership ecosystem is extensive, with multiple linked brands and service providers, indicating a well-integrated operational structure.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic with significant gaps. The absence of a valid SSL certificate is a critical vulnerability that exposes users to potential interception and undermines trust. Lack of DNSSEC, DMARC, HSTS, and OCSP stapling further weakens the security posture. The cookie consent mechanism is well implemented and GDPR compliant, but no explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published. This indicates limited transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The business impact of these vulnerabilities includes potential data exposure, phishing risks, and regulatory non-compliance. Enhancing SSL/TLS configuration and publishing security policies would improve the security culture and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  4. Enable DMARC, SPF, and DKIM records to improve email security and reduce phishing risks.
  5. Activate HSTS and OCSP stapling to enhance HTTPS security and performance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is hosted on One.com with DNS managed by ns01.one.com and ns02.one.com. The tech stack includes JavaScript, CSS, Google Fonts, and third-party widgets such as Teamtailor for recruitment and Consentmanager for cookie compliance. Performance is moderate with a page load time of approximately 4.7 seconds and 46 resources loaded. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and missing security headers indicate technical debt and security risks. Modernization opportunities include upgrading SSL configuration, adding security headers, and improving DNS security. These technical risks could impact business operations by reducing user trust and exposing the site to attacks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jobs.one. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jobs.one.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.