Skip to main content

Security report for joaomouro.com

Other · Japan

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.joaomouro.com is a Japanese-language skincare product recommendation site focusing on cosmetics and lotions effective for troubled or sensitive skin. It primarily operates as an affiliate marketing platform, linking users to skincare products with promotional content. The site targets Japanese consumers interested in skincare solutions, offering product rankings and reviews. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with embedded JSON-LD structured data for breadcrumbs and includes third-party tracking scripts from Research Artisan Pro. The site lacks advanced frameworks or CMS indications and shows basic mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS confirmation, absence of security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site provides relevant content but lacks critical security and compliance features, limiting its credibility and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching joaomouro.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model is affiliate marketing within the niche skincare sector targeting Japanese consumers. The site leverages external affiliate networks (Afi-b) and tracking tools to monetize traffic. Market positioning is niche and content-focused without clear company branding or contact information. The absence of WHOIS data and lack of privacy or terms policies suggest a low maturity level and potential risks in trust and compliance. The site does not disclose business registration or certifications, limiting transparency. Growth potential depends on SEO and affiliate conversions, but security and compliance gaps may hinder long-term sustainability.

Security posture

The security maturity is low. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, no privacy or cookie policies, and no incident response or security contact information. The site uses third-party tracking scripts which may increase privacy risks without user consent mechanisms. The missing WHOIS data is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content, but the lack of security best practices and compliance policies exposes the site to potential risks and regulatory issues.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Publish clear contact information including email and phone for business and security incidents.
  4. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides information and rankings about skincare cosmetics and lotions effective for troubled skin, targeting users seeking skincare solutions for sensitive or problematic skin.
Key services
Skincare product reviews, Affiliate links to purchase skincare products
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, JSON-LD, Research Artisan Pro tracking script
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Afi-b
Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Marketing tools
Research Artisan Pro tracking
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. Website is in Japanese language targeting skincare consumers.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found.
  5. Affiliate marketing is the primary business model.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
  7. Tracking scripts from Research Artisan Pro and affiliate links present.
  8. WHOIS data missing, indicating possible domain registration issues.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic web technologies (HTML, CSS, JavaScript) and includes JSON-LD structured data for SEO. It uses a third-party tracking service (Research Artisan Pro) and affiliate marketing links. There is no detected CMS or advanced framework. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile responsiveness but lacks accessibility features. No hosting provider or infrastructure details are available. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities include improving SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with joaomouro.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review joaomouro.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.