Skip to main content

Security report for jnj.com

Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. operates a comprehensive and professionally designed website focused on healthcare innovation, corporate information, investor relations, and career opportunities. The company is a global leader in healthcare, providing pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and consumer health products. The website targets healthcare providers, patients, investors, and job seekers, offering rich content and clear navigation. Technically, the site uses a modern CMS (Brightspot), integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, and is optimized for mobile and accessibility. However, the SSL/TLS configuration is currently broken, resulting in no valid HTTPS encryption, which is a critical security concern. Security headers are well implemented, but the lack of a valid certificate and disabled TLS protocols significantly reduce the security posture. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Business credibility is high, supported by consistent branding, trust indicators, and legitimate domain registration. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires urgent remediation of SSL/TLS issues to ensure secure user interactions.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of jnj.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jnj.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jnj.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
49,388
Employees
822
Customers
32,129
Third parties
16,437
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2026-06-17 · 300 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for jnj.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –fedlogin.jnj.com2026-06-17
  • –fedlogin.jnj.com2026-06-17
  • –qv.jnj.com2026-06-17
  • –fedlogin.jnj.com2026-06-17
  • –fedlogin.jnj.com2026-06-16

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Johnson & Johnson maintains a strong market position as a healthcare industry leader with a diversified portfolio in pharmaceuticals, MedTech, and consumer health. The website reflects a mature business model with multiple revenue streams and a global presence, including regional sites for key markets like China, France, Japan, and Switzerland. The company emphasizes innovation, corporate responsibility, and inclusion, supported by extensive content and investor resources. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains for innovative medicine and MedTech, as well as career and investor portals. Growth indicators include frequent news updates and a focus on cutting-edge therapies. The website's structure and content support strategic business objectives and stakeholder engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with several best practices in place, such as strict transport security, content security policy, XSS protection, and frame options. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent critical vulnerabilities that expose users to potential interception and data compromise. OCSP stapling and session resumption are also disabled, impacting both security and performance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, indicating potential gaps in transparency. Overall, the security posture is weakened by the SSL/TLS issues but benefits from strong header policies and privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Urgently fix the SSL certificate to enable valid HTTPS and enable TLS 1.2 and 1.3 protocols.
  2. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  3. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update security headers and CSP to adapt to emerging threats.
  5. Maintain and enhance privacy compliance measures, including clear data retention policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Brightspot CMS platform and leverages modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Brightcove video player, Hotjar, Kameleoon, and OneTrust for cookie consent. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure, supported by S3 and CDN usage. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data. Performance metrics were not available, but the presence of multiple third-party scripts may impact load times. The technical stack is modern but requires remediation of SSL/TLS issues to ensure secure and performant user experience. Opportunities exist to streamline third-party integrations and enhance performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100 +7Medium27 findingsView report
  2. 68/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jnj.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jnj.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.