Skip to main content

Security report for jnj.com

Johnson & Johnson · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Johnson & Johnson is a globally recognized healthcare enterprise specializing in innovative medicines, medical devices, and consumer health products. The company positions itself as a leader in preventing and curing complex diseases with a focus on smarter, less invasive treatments and personalized solutions. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content targeting healthcare professionals, investors, job seekers, and the general public interested in health. The business model is diversified across multiple healthcare sectors, maintaining a strong market position worldwide. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks, WebComponents, and a Brightspot CMS platform. It integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, and Kameleoon for A/B testing, alongside a robust cookie consent mechanism powered by OneTrust. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, indicating a high level of digital maturity. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and implements key security headers. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, with clear consent mechanisms. However, explicit security policies, incident response details, and vulnerability disclosure programs are not publicly available, representing areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and secure, supporting Johnson & Johnson's reputation as a leading healthcare company. The absence of WHOIS data is likely due to privacy protection, common for large enterprises, and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security and incident response policies, establishing a vulnerability disclosure program, and enhancing transparency around data retention and protection officer contacts.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jnj.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jnj.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
49,388
Employees
822
Customers
32,129
Third parties
16,437
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2026-06-17 · 300 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for jnj.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –fedlogin.jnj.com2026-06-17
  • –fedlogin.jnj.com2026-06-17
  • –qv.jnj.com2026-06-17
  • –fedlogin.jnj.com2026-06-17
  • –fedlogin.jnj.com2026-06-16

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Johnson & Johnson operates as a multinational healthcare corporation with a diversified portfolio spanning pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and consumer health products. The company targets healthcare professionals, investors, and consumers globally, leveraging a strong brand and extensive R&D capabilities. Its market position is that of a global leader with a broad product range and innovation focus. Revenue streams include medicines, therapies, medical technologies, and consumer products. The company maintains a robust partnership ecosystem and invests in digital transformation to enhance customer engagement and operational efficiency. Growth indicators include active investor relations, innovation pipelines, and global career opportunities. The website's structure and content reflect a mature, enterprise-grade digital strategy aligned with corporate goals.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, excellent SSL configuration, and implementation of critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security. Privacy compliance is robust, featuring comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the absence of publicly available security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure programs suggests room for improvement in transparency and security culture communication. The site uses reputable third-party analytics and marketing tools, which should be regularly audited to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is high but could benefit from enhanced disclosure and formalized security governance information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and user trust.
  2. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Provide contact information for the Data Protection Officer or privacy team to enhance GDPR compliance and user confidence.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to minimize potential vulnerabilities from external dependencies.
  5. Enhance data retention policy disclosures and cookie management options to align with evolving privacy regulations and best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Johnson & Johnson
Description
We’re building a world where complex diseases are prevented and cured, treatments are smarter and less invasive—and solutions are personal.
Key services
Medicines & therapies, Medical devices & technology, Healthcare information and innovation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, Brightcove video player, OneTrust cookie consent, Kameleoon A/B testing
Frameworks
WebComponents, Brightspot CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Kameleoon
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Kameleoon
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, Kameleoon
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong corporate branding and consistent design
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  5. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious content
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info publicly available
  8. No vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including JavaScript, WebComponents, and the Brightspot CMS platform. It integrates multiple third-party services such as Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, Brightcove video player, OneTrust for cookie consent, and Kameleoon for A/B testing. The site demonstrates good performance and mobile optimization, with responsive design and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed through proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD markup. The technical infrastructure supports a large enterprise with complex content and user engagement needs. Opportunities exist to further optimize hosting and reduce third-party script load to improve performance and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100 +10Medium29 findingsView report
  2. 58/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jnj.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jnj.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.