Skip to main content

Security report for jnj.com

Johnson & Johnson · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Johnson & Johnson is a globally recognized healthcare conglomerate focused on innovative medicines, medical devices, and consumer health products. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content targeting healthcare professionals, investors, job seekers, and the general public. The company maintains a strong market position as a leader in healthcare innovation and social impact. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Brightspot CMS, Google Analytics, and OneTrust for cookie consent, ensuring a good user experience and compliance with privacy regulations. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no detected vulnerabilities, though incident response contact details could be more explicit. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for SEO and accessibility.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of jnj.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jnj.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
70
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jnj.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
49,388
Employees
822
Customers
32,129
Third parties
16,437
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2026-06-17 · 300 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for jnj.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –fedlogin.jnj.com2026-06-17
  • –fedlogin.jnj.com2026-06-17
  • –qv.jnj.com2026-06-17
  • –fedlogin.jnj.com2026-06-17
  • –fedlogin.jnj.com2026-06-16

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the healthcare sector with a diversified portfolio including medicines, therapies, and medical devices. It targets multiple customer segments globally, supported by regional domains and localized content. The business model is enterprise-level with a focus on innovation, social responsibility, and stakeholder value. The website supports investor relations, career opportunities, and corporate social impact initiatives, indicating a comprehensive ecosystem. Partnerships and subsidiaries are reflected in multiple official subdomains and regional sites. The company demonstrates strong branding consistency and trust signals such as certifications and detailed policies.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a public vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file and lack of explicit incident response contact information represent areas for improvement. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts is balanced with privacy compliance. Overall, the security maturity is high, supporting the enterprise nature of the business.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance data retention policy disclosures to align with privacy best practices.
  5. Continue to monitor and update security headers and SSL configurations to maintain high security standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Johnson & Johnson
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Johnson & Johnson
Description
We’re building a world where complex diseases are prevented and cured, treatments are smarter and less invasive—and solutions are personal.
Key services
Medicines & therapies, Medical devices & technology, Healthcare innovation, Investor relations, Career opportunities
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Brightcove video player, OneTrust cookie consent, Facebook SDK, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Kameleoon
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Kameleoon
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, limiting domain registration analysis.
  3. Strong corporate branding and consistent navigation structure.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools with privacy compliance.
  6. No security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data detected.
  7. No adult or questionable content present; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Brightspot CMS, JavaScript frameworks, and integrates multiple third-party services such as Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, and OneTrust for cookie management. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well implemented with proper meta tags, Open Graph, and structured data (JSON-LD). The site uses CDN-hosted fonts and scripts to optimize loading times. Technical risks are minimal, but continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is recommended to avoid supply chain vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100 +17Medium27 findingsView report
  2. 58/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jnj.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jnj.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.