Skip to main content

Security report for jj.no

JJ Design AS · Other · Norway

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JJ Design AS is a Norwegian design agency established in 2000, offering a broad range of services including website development, print materials, branding, film production, and event management. The company positions itself as a versatile and enthusiastic partner for businesses seeking comprehensive design and marketing solutions. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting Norwegian businesses and organizations. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, leveraging modern web technologies such as jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, with good SEO and accessibility basics. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit security policies. The domain registration is consistent with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, JJ Design demonstrates a mature digital presence suitable for its market niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jj.no

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JJ Design operates as a small-sized essential entity in the design and marketing sector, focusing on creative services for local Norwegian clients. Their business model revolves around service provision with a strong emphasis on versatility and personal service. The company holds the Miljøfyrtårn environmental certification, signaling commitment to sustainability. Their digital footprint includes active social media channels on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube, supporting marketing and client engagement. The website content and structure suggest a well-established agency with a clear market position and consistent branding. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating independent operation. The company leverages modern CMS and marketing tools to maintain competitive advantage and client reach.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. A cookie consent banner is present, supporting GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Security headers such as CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options are not detected, representing a potential area for strengthening defenses against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. The use of popular and maintained libraries like jQuery and MediaElement.js reduces risk, but continuous monitoring for library updates is recommended. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information on the website.
  2. Add and configure security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
JJ Design AS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JJ Design AS
Description
Trenger du hjelp med nettsider, trykksaker, profilering, film eller events? I JJ Design har vi stor tro på allsidighet, masse begeistring og en god dæsj personlig sørvis.
Key services
nettsider (websites), trykksaker (print materials), profilering (branding/profiling), film, events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, MediaElement.js, Google Fonts (Montserrat), Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Norwegian language.
  3. Clear contact information with emails and phone numbers linked to company domain.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and GDPR compliance is indicated.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response information publicly available.
  6. Use of modern WordPress CMS with Divi theme and common JS libraries.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube.
  8. Miljøfyrtårn environmental certification prominently displayed.
  9. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Divi theme, a widely used and feature-rich framework. It uses jQuery and MediaElement.js for interactive and media functionalities. Google Fonts (Montserrat) is used for typography, and Google Tag Manager is implemented for analytics and tracking. The site loads CSS and JS resources efficiently with deferred loading and caching mechanisms. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data are properly implemented. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in image optimization and script loading. No hosting provider details are explicitly found, but the site uses HTTPS and modern web standards. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid and supports the business needs effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jj.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jj.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.