Skip to main content

Security report for jifo.co

INFOGRAM SIA · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The domain jifo.co is registered to INFOGRAM SIA, a Latvian company established in 2013, indicating a mature business entity. However, the website content is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Access Denied error, preventing any direct analysis of the site's content, metadata, or business offerings. This blockage severely limits the ability to assess the company's digital presence, user experience, and compliance posture. The technical infrastructure shows use of Cloudflare DNS services but lacks DNSSEC, which is a recommended security enhancement. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are detectable, and no contact or social media information is available from the site content. The WHOIS data is consistent and trustworthy, with no privacy protection or suspicious registration patterns. Overall, the website's security posture and compliance cannot be fully evaluated due to the blocked content, resulting in a low AI score and limited insights.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of jifo.co. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jifo.co

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

INFOGRAM SIA appears to be the legal entity behind the domain jifo.co, registered in Latvia since 2013. The lack of accessible website content prevents identification of the company's market positioning, business model, or key services. No external partnerships or subsidiary domains are identified. The domain status clientTransferProhibited suggests a stable registration. Without visible content or metadata, no conclusions can be drawn about revenue streams, target customers, or growth indicators. The company likely operates in a technology-related sector given the domain and registrar, but this remains speculative without further data.

Security posture

The website is protected by Cloudflare, which is currently blocking access with an Access Denied error, indicating a strict WAF or security policy in place. No security headers or SSL configuration details are available for review. DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a minor security gap. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests limited transparency and compliance readiness. The security posture is difficult to assess fully but appears minimal from the available data. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing security and privacy policies, and ensuring the website content is accessible to legitimate users.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and trust.
  2. Review Cloudflare WAF settings to prevent legitimate user access issues and improve user experience.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to meet compliance requirements.
  4. Establish clear contact channels for security incident reporting and vulnerability disclosures.
  5. Implement security headers and ensure HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration for improved security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Access Denied error page served by Cloudflare indicating content is blocked or restricted These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
INFOGRAM SIA
Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to Cloudflare Access Denied error
  2. No metadata, forms, scripts, or business content available for analysis
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms policies found
  4. No contact information or social media links detected
  5. WHOIS data indicates a legitimate domain registered to a Latvian company since 2013
  6. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a recommended security improvement
  7. No security headers or SSL configuration details available due to blocked content
  8. Overall website quality and security posture cannot be fully assessed due to lack of accessible content
Technical notes

Notes

The domain uses Cloudflare name servers indicating CDN and security services usage. The website content is blocked by Cloudflare Access Denied error, preventing analysis of HTML, scripts, or CMS technologies. No metadata or structured data is present in the accessible content. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security best practice. The lack of accessible content also prevents evaluation of performance, mobile optimization, accessibility, or SEO. The technical infrastructure appears minimal and possibly misconfigured to block legitimate access, which should be addressed to improve digital maturity and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100 +1Medium30 findingsView report
  2. 65/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jifo.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jifo.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.