Skip to main content

Security report for jibe.com

iCIMS · Technology · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

iCIMS is a leading enterprise recruiting software platform and the #1 applicant tracking system, providing comprehensive talent acquisition solutions to employers and HR professionals. The company operates a sophisticated SaaS platform designed to attract, engage, hire, and advance top talent. Their market position as a leader is supported by strong branding, certifications, and a broad service offering. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design and clear business messaging. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Bootstrap and jQuery, integrating advanced marketing and analytics tools such as Marketo, Visual Website Optimizer, and Google Tag Manager. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and monitoring tools, though some security headers and dedicated security policies could be improved. The security evaluation shows no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of a public security policy or incident response page and missing WHOIS data are areas for improvement. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, iCIMS presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic enhancements in security transparency and WHOIS data visibility would further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jibe.com

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
100
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

iCIMS holds a strong market position as a leader in recruiting software and applicant tracking systems, targeting enterprise clients and HR professionals. Their SaaS business model focuses on delivering cloud-based talent acquisition solutions. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with marketing automation and analytics platforms to optimize customer engagement. Their certifications such as SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 reinforce their commitment to security and compliance. The website content and structure support a clear value proposition and demonstrate a consistent brand identity. Growth indicators include extensive use of digital marketing tools and a comprehensive online presence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and integrates security monitoring tools like New Relic. No critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were explicitly detected, suggesting room for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response page limits transparency. WHOIS data is unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection, which slightly reduces trust. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from improved header implementation and public security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance accessibility compliance to improve usability for all users and meet regulatory standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
iCIMS, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
iCIMS
Description
iCIMS is a leading enterprise recruiting software and applicant tracking system that empowers employers to attract, engage, hire, and advance top talent.
Key services
Recruiting software platform, Applicant tracking system, Talent acquisition solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress CMS, Bootstrap 4.6.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Marketo marketing automation, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), New Relic monitoring
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security monitoring tools (New Relic)
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Marketo, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Marketo, Facebook Pixel, Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing tools
Marketo, Visual Website Optimizer, ZoomInfo, Oktopost
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Professional recruiting software platform with strong branding
  3. Uses multiple marketing and analytics tools including Marketo and VWO
  4. No visible security policy or incident response page found
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection or registrar issues
  6. Good SEO and structured data implementation
  7. No adult or questionable content detected
  8. Multiple external trusted domains used for fonts, scripts, and analytics
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap 4.6.2 and jQuery 3.7.1, indicating a modern but standard web technology stack. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Marketo, Visual Website Optimizer, Google Tag Manager, and New Relic for performance monitoring. The site uses Google Fonts and CDN services for resource delivery. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of scripts and CSS preloading. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features are basic. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence with opportunities for further optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jibe.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jibe.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.