Skip to main content

Security report for jfmk.de

Jugend- und Familienministerkonferenz der Länder (JFMK) · Government · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Jugend- und Familienministerkonferenz der Länder (JFMK) website serves as the official online presence for the German governmental conference focused on youth and family policy coordination across federal states. The site provides information about the conference's mission, leadership, and activities, targeting government officials, policy makers, and families in Germany. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, supporting its role as a trusted governmental resource. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and several plugins including LayerSlider, Ultimate Member, Borlabs Cookie, and Yoast SEO. It is hosted with domaincontrol.com nameservers, likely GoDaddy, and uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, although some security headers are not explicitly detected. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were found in the analyzed content. However, the site lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which could be improved to enhance trust and security posture. Overall, the website is a secure, professional, and trustworthy governmental platform with good privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include adding security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and implementing a vulnerability disclosure process to further strengthen security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jfmk.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
55
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JFMK operates as a governmental conference entity coordinating youth and family policies among German federal states. Its market position is authoritative within the governmental sector, serving as a platform for policy discussion and coordination. The business model is non-commercial, focused on public service and policy development. The target audience includes government officials, policy makers, and families. The website supports information dissemination and event coordination. Growth indicators include active leadership changes and updated content. The partnership ecosystem is primarily governmental with no commercial partners detected. The organization's operations are stable and aligned with its governmental mandate.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and GDPR-compliant cookie consent implemented. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The use of reputable WordPress plugins and regular updates is implied but not explicitly confirmed. The absence of security headers and incident response information represents a compliance gap. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could benefit from enhanced security documentation and header implementation to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance contact information availability to improve user trust and support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jugend- und Familienministerkonferenz der Länder (JFMK)
Description
Konferenz der für die Kinder-, Jugend- und Familienpolitik zuständigen Ministerinnen und Minister sowie Senatorinnen und Senatoren
Key services
Policy coordination, Information dissemination, Event and conference hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, LayerSlider, Ultimate Member plugin, Borlabs Cookie plugin, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Avada Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found
  • Use of security and GDPR compliance plugins

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Borlabs Cookie
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a German governmental conference site focused on youth and family policy.
  2. Content is in German and professionally presented.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the homepage or footer.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No terms of service page found.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  7. Uses WordPress CMS with Avada theme and several plugins for SEO, user management, and cookie consent.
  8. No advertising or tracking pixels detected beyond cookie management.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities detected in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Avada theme, supported by plugins for SEO (Yoast), user management (Ultimate Member), cookie consent (Borlabs Cookie), and interactive content (LayerSlider). The site loads scripts and styles efficiently, uses responsive design, and supports accessibility features. Hosting is via domaincontrol.com nameservers, indicating a commercial hosting provider. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The technical stack is standard for governmental informational sites, balancing functionality and maintainability. No outdated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jfmk.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jfmk.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.