Skip to main content

Security report for jfd.cz

Jan Ficek Dřevovýroba · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jan Ficek Dřevovýroba is a Czech manufacturing company specializing in the production and sale of wood veneer products, furniture, and related wood components. The company serves furniture and door manufacturers and offers a wide range of products including sesazenky, edges, custom furniture, and digital printing on wood. The website reflects a well-established regional business with sister companies Grena and Javab, indicating a diversified business ecosystem. The company holds multiple ISO certifications, enhancing its credibility and market position. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Elementor Pro, with performance optimizations via WP Rocket. It employs modern web technologies, is mobile-optimized, and includes SEO best practices. The presence of GDPR-compliant cookie consent and privacy policies demonstrates attention to privacy regulations. Social media integration and Google Tag Manager indicate a mature digital marketing approach. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, security headers likely present, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of explicit security policies or incident response information suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The lack of WHOIS data reduces trust slightly but is mitigated by other trust signals. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant, supporting the company's business credibility. Strategic recommendations include publishing security and incident response policies, implementing a security.txt file, and enhancing transparency around data protection officers and vulnerability disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jfd.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jan Ficek Dřevovýroba operates in the manufacturing sector focused on wood products and furniture components. The company targets B2B customers such as furniture and door manufacturers. Its diversified product portfolio and sister companies suggest a robust business model with multiple revenue streams. The company leverages certifications and compliance to maintain competitive advantage. The website's multilingual support and active social media presence indicate efforts to expand market reach. Partnerships with web development and sister companies reflect a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators include regular updates and new product offerings. The business model is traditional manufacturing combined with modern marketing and digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of security plugins like Complianz for GDPR compliance. Security headers are inferred to be present, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. The cookie consent mechanism is robust and opt-in based. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness. No security.txt file or DPO contact information is found. The site uses third-party scripts including Google Tag Manager and social media integrations, which should be regularly audited. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and disclosure channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness.
  2. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve security communication.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Provide public contact information for a Data Protection Officer to enhance GDPR compliance visibility.
  5. Enhance HTTP security headers with reporting and monitoring to detect and respond to threats promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Jan Ficek Dřevovýroba
Registration number
27482693
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jan Ficek Dřevovýroba
Description
Vyrábíme dýhové sesazenky a hrany, nábytek a nábytkové dílce ze všech známých druhů dřevin. Sesazenky, hrany a dílce dodáváme výrobcům nábytku, dveří.
Key services
Výroba sesazenek, Výroba hran, Výroba nábytku, Výroba dílců, Prodej dýhy, Intarzie, Digitální tisk, Gravírování/laser, Masivní podlahy, Ostatní produkty
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Elementor Pro, jQuery, WP Rocket, Google Tag Manager, Complianz GDPR plugin
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (Complianz)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Ads, Google Ads, Sklik
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (inferred)
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, Complianz GDPR
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple language options.
  2. Strong presence of GDPR and cookie compliance mechanisms.
  3. Clear contact information with company domain emails and phone numbers.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimization plugins.
  5. No visible security or privacy policy pages beyond GDPR and cookie policies.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but not critical given other trust signals.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube.
  8. Multiple sister companies linked and promoted on the site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor and Elementor Pro for design and layout. Performance is optimized with WP Rocket, including lazy loading and script deferral. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing integration, and Complianz GDPR plugin for privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. No hosting provider information is directly available. The technical stack is current and well-maintained, supporting good user experience and compliance. Opportunities exist to improve security transparency and incident response readiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jfd.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jfd.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.