Skip to main content

Security report for jetshopping.com.br

JET e-Business · E-commerce · Brazil

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JET e-Business is a Brazilian e-commerce platform provider offering high-performance, customizable solutions for B2C, B2B, D2C, and B2B2C business models. The company positions itself as a strategic partner for businesses seeking to scale their online sales with integrated marketplace management, analytics, and shipping solutions. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive marketing and analytics integrations, including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Bing Ads. However, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate and modern TLS support, which poses security risks. DNS configurations are properly set with SPF and DMARC policies, but DNSSEC and CAA records are absent. The company provides clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, but no explicit security or incident response policies are publicly available. Overall, JET demonstrates a strong market position in the e-commerce technology sector but should urgently address its SSL/TLS deficiencies to improve security and trust.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching jetshopping.com.br

This scan found 6 issues across 3 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
Average
93
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JET targets medium-sized businesses in Brazil with significant e-commerce operations, including those with revenues exceeding R$200,000 monthly. Their business model focuses on providing a comprehensive omnichannel platform with professional services and integrations to marketplaces and logistics. The company leverages a strong ecosystem of partners and integrations, supporting over 150 solutions. Customer testimonials and case studies highlight their commitment to performance and customer success. The presence of a dedicated WhatsApp contact form and multiple social media channels indicates a customer-centric approach. JET's market position is reinforced by its focus on technology, customization, and results-driven services.

Security posture

The current security posture of the JET website is moderate but with critical gaps. While DNS records include SPF and DMARC with a quarantine policy, the absence of DNSSEC and CAA records reduces DNS security. The lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols means the site does not enforce encrypted communications, exposing users to potential interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. No HTTP security headers like HSTS are enabled, and OCSP stapling is absent. There is no publicly disclosed security policy or incident response plan, which limits transparency and preparedness. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection and has cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is basic and requires immediate improvements in transport security and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and protect user data.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable all insecure protocols.
  3. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload options.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  5. Consider deploying DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance DNS security and certificate issuance control.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using WPBakery Page Builder, hosted on AWS infrastructure with DNS managed by AWS Route53. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Bing Ads, and RD Station. The site has a large page size (~3.5MB) and high resource count (313), resulting in slow load times (~15 seconds). Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and adaptive content. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA attributes and skip links present. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. However, the lack of SSL/TLS and security headers is a significant technical risk. The site uses advanced form handling with country code selection and validation. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but needs security hardening and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jetshopping.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jetshopping.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.