Skip to main content

Security report for jet.com.br

JET e-Business · E-commerce · Brazil

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JET e-Business is a Brazilian e-commerce platform provider specializing in high-performance solutions for B2C, B2B, D2C, and B2B2C business models. The company offers a comprehensive suite of services including marketplace integration, storefront customization, search optimization, shipping facilitation, and analytics. Positioned as a strategic partner, JET supports e-commerce businesses with technology and expert guidance to enhance sales and operational efficiency. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence targeting Brazilian e-commerce companies. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WPBakery Page Builder, hosted on Hostinger, and protected by Cloudflare. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS enforcement represent significant security weaknesses. The site has basic privacy compliance with a privacy policy and SPF/DMARC DNS records configured, but lacks cookie consent mechanisms and security.txt disclosures. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires improvements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jet.com.br

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JET e-Business operates in the competitive Brazilian e-commerce technology sector, offering tailored omnichannel solutions that cater to diverse business types including retailers, distributors, and wholesalers. Their platform supports multiple sales channels and integrates with major marketplaces, enhancing scalability and operational control. The company leverages partnerships with email and marketing service providers such as SendGrid, Amazon SES, and RD Station, indicating a robust marketing ecosystem. Client testimonials and social media presence reinforce market credibility. The business model focuses on SaaS and professional services, targeting medium-sized e-commerce businesses seeking growth and technological advancement. The presence of a dedicated contact page and active social media channels suggests a customer-centric approach. The company was founded in 2022 and maintains a medium-sized operational scale.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is basic with critical gaps. The lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols expose users to potential data interception and trust issues. While DNS records show proper SPF and DMARC configurations, the absence of HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption reduces the effectiveness of HTTPS security. No explicit security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. The site uses Cloudflare for CDN and some security headers like Content Security Policy are set to upgrade insecure requests, which is positive. However, cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which may impact GDPR compliance. Overall, the site requires urgent improvements in SSL/TLS configuration and privacy controls to enhance security and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate with support for TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 to secure all site traffic.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives to enforce HTTPS usage.
  3. Deploy OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and reduce latency.
  4. Introduce a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  5. Publish a security.txt file and establish a clear vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency and incident response.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using WPBakery Page Builder, hosted on Hostinger and served behind Cloudflare CDN. It employs LiteSpeed server technology and integrates multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and PixelYourSite. DNS configurations are robust with multiple AWS Route53 nameservers and valid SPF and DMARC records. However, the SSL/TLS configuration is severely lacking with no valid certificate and no TLS protocols enabled, which is a critical risk. Performance data is not available but the use of caching and CDN suggests moderate performance. Mobile optimization and SEO are good, with responsive design and structured data (JSON-LD) implemented for SEO and social sharing. Technical debt is indicated by missing SSL and incomplete security headers. Modernization efforts should prioritize security hardening and performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jet.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jet.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.