Skip to main content

Security report for jerkroom.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jerkroom.com is a niche adult content website offering free pornographic image galleries categorized by various adult themes. The site targets adults-only audiences and operates primarily as a free content aggregator with advertising and affiliate links to partner adult video sites. The website has been active since 2010, indicating a stable presence in the adult entertainment niche. Technically, the site uses basic web technologies including jQuery 1.11.0 and Cloudflare DNS services, but lacks modern security enhancements such as DNSSEC and security headers. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, but it does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. Security posture is basic with room for improvement in SSL configuration and header implementation. Overall, the site functions adequately for its purpose but has limited privacy and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jerkroom.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model revolves around providing free adult content galleries to attract traffic and monetize via advertising and affiliate partnerships, such as with vipwank.com. The site targets adult consumers interested in diverse pornographic categories. Market positioning is that of a free content aggregator in the adult entertainment sector, with a modest but consistent user base. The lack of detailed company information and absence of privacy policies suggest a small-scale operation focused on content delivery rather than formal corporate presence. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple external adult sites linked for additional content. Growth indicators are not explicit but the long domain age suggests sustained operation.

Security posture

Security maturity is low to moderate. The domain is registered with a reputable registrar and protected against unauthorized transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The site uses HTTPS (assumed) but SSL configuration details are unknown. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Incident response contact is provided via an abuse email, which is a positive indicator. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages are found. Overall, the site should enhance security controls and privacy compliance to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  4. Ensure HTTPS is properly configured with strong SSL/TLS settings.
  5. Add terms of service and security policy pages to increase transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Free porn galleries. Categorized free porn pictures archive.
Key services
free pornographic image galleries, categorized adult content, links to partner adult video sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.0, Cloudflare DNS, HTML5, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
rmhfrtnd.com
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a free adult content image gallery aggregator.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact email for abuse is provided in the footer.
  4. Site uses Cloudflare DNS but no DNSSEC or advanced security headers.
  5. Content is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  6. Advertising is present via embedded iframes from rmhfrtnd.com.
  7. Site uses older jQuery version (1.11.0).
  8. No social media links or phone numbers found.
  9. Site includes RTA label for parental control.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses an older version of jQuery (1.11.0) which may have known vulnerabilities; updating to a modern version is recommended. The site relies on Cloudflare for DNS but does not enable DNSSEC, missing an opportunity for enhanced DNS security. The HTML structure is basic with minimal SEO optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with external scripts loaded from Google CDN. Advertising is integrated via iframes from rmhfrtnd.com. The site lacks structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags, limiting SEO and social media integration. Mobile optimization is basic but present. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated and could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jerkroom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jerkroom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.