Skip to main content

Security report for jensenmetal.eu

Other · Denmark

Partial score · DNS & email only

54/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website jensenmetal.eu is currently inaccessible for normal browsing and business content review due to a security CAPTCHA challenge page implemented by BitNinja. This page is designed to block automated bots and requires human verification before access is granted. Consequently, no actual business content, privacy policies, or contact information are available for analysis. The domain is registered with a reputable Danish registrar, team.blue Denmark A/S, indicating legitimate ownership and hosting in Denmark. The presence of outdated CMS meta tags (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) suggests legacy software usage, which poses security risks. Technically, the site uses Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation and Google Analytics for tracking, but lacks visible modern security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. The site’s design and content quality are poor due to the blocking mechanism and lack of accessible content. Security posture is weak given the outdated CMS versions and absence of security headers, though the CAPTCHA challenge provides some bot protection. Overall, the site’s risk profile is elevated due to limited accessibility, outdated technology, and lack of compliance documentation. Strategic recommendations include upgrading CMS platforms, implementing comprehensive security headers, enforcing HTTPS, and publishing privacy and cookie policies to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jensenmetal.eu

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
54

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the blocking CAPTCHA page, no direct business information or market positioning details are available. The domain is registered in Denmark by team.blue Denmark A/S, a known hosting provider. The lack of accessible content or contact details limits insights into business model, revenue streams, or customer segments. The site appears to be protected by BitNinja security services, indicating a focus on security but also possibly reflecting prior security incidents or bot attacks. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identifiable from the current data.

Security posture

The website employs BitNinja’s security service to block automated access via CAPTCHA, which is a positive bot mitigation measure. However, the underlying CMS versions indicated (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) are severely outdated and vulnerable. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS are visible in the HTML content. HTTPS status is unknown from the data but is critical to verify. No privacy or incident response policies are published. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA and Google Analytics, but lacks transparency on data protection. Overall, the security posture is weak with critical upgrade needs.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade Joomla and WordPress installations to supported, secure versions or migrate to a modern CMS.
  2. Implement standard security HTTP headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is properly configured and enforced site-wide with strong TLS settings.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  5. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

BitNinja detected. Website is blocked by BitNinja security service showing a CAPTCHA challenge page to verify visitor is not a bot. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
The website is currently displaying a security CAPTCHA challenge page to verify visitors are not automated bots. No business description or content is available.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Joomla! 1.5, WordPress 2.5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by a security CAPTCHA challenge (BitNinja).
  2. No actual business content or pages are accessible.
  3. Outdated CMS versions detected in meta tags indicating potential security risks.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  5. No contact information or business details available on the page.
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. No security headers visible in HTML content.
  8. No visible SSL/TLS configuration details in provided data.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain registered with a reputable registrar in Denmark.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses legacy CMS platforms Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are no longer supported and pose significant security risks. The presence of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager indicates basic analytics integration. The site is hosted by team.blue Denmark A/S, a reputable registrar and hosting provider. The CAPTCHA challenge is implemented via BitNinja security services, indicating a layered security approach but also blocking normal content access. The site’s design is minimal and not optimized for mobile or SEO. There is no evidence of modern frameworks or platforms beyond legacy CMS and standard JavaScript libraries.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jensenmetal.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jensenmetal.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.