Skip to main content

Security report for jekabpilssc.lv

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

54/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at jekabpilssc.lv is currently inaccessible beyond a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page designed to block automated bots and verify human visitors. This page does not provide any business or company information, serving solely as a gatekeeper to the actual site content. The presence of outdated CMS meta tags (Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5) suggests legacy technology usage, but no active content or services are visible. The site integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking, and uses Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation. However, no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact or business details are available. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site is in a blocked state, preventing meaningful business or security analysis beyond the CAPTCHA challenge.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jekabpilssc.lv

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the site being blocked by a security challenge, no business intelligence data such as market positioning, business model, or company details can be extracted. The lack of contact information, privacy policies, or certifications further limits insights into the organization's operations or credibility. The site appears to be protected by BitNinja security services, indicating some level of concern for cyber threats but no visible business presence.

Security posture

The security posture is partially observable through the use of BitNinja's CAPTCHA challenge and Google reCAPTCHA v2, which help mitigate automated attacks and bot traffic. However, no security headers or SSL configuration details were found in the provided data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact information for incident response, indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. The site is currently inaccessible without passing the CAPTCHA, which limits further security evaluation. Overall, the security measures are basic but effective at blocking unwanted traffic, though improvements in transparency and header configurations are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is properly configured and enforced site-wide with strong SSL/TLS settings.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels and data protection officer contacts.
  5. Modernize the CMS and underlying technology stack to supported versions to reduce security risks and technical debt.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

BitNinja detected. The website content is a BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge page blocking direct access to the actual site content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
This page is a security CAPTCHA challenge page to verify visitors are not automated bots. It does not provide business or company information.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5, Drupal, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation
  • Security challenge page to prevent automated access

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is currently blocked by BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge
  2. No business or company information is publicly accessible on this page
  3. No contact information, privacy policy, or terms of service found
  4. Uses outdated CMS versions indicated by meta tags (Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5)
  5. Includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts for tracking
  6. No visible security headers or SSL configuration details in provided data
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  8. Page is minimal and designed solely for bot mitigation
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses legacy CMS platforms indicated by meta tags referencing Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are outdated and potentially vulnerable. The presence of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts indicates tracking and marketing integration. The CAPTCHA challenge is implemented using Google reCAPTCHA v2 and BitNinja's security framework. The page is moderately optimized for mobile but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No hosting provider or SSL details were found in the data. The site performance is moderate but limited by the blocking challenge. Technical debt is evident due to outdated CMS references and missing modern security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jekabpilssc.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jekabpilssc.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.