Skip to main content

Is jeffcomo.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Jefferson County, MO

jeffcomo.org Security Report Summary

jeffcomo.org received a security score of 58 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Elevated Risk". This report covers Jefferson County, MO's website security posture. Jefferson County, MO operates in the Government industry in United States.

Jefferson County, Missouri operates an official government website providing residents and visitors with access to county news, services, departments, and community resources. The site serves as a central hub for information such as emergency alerts, tax payments, permits, employment opportunities, and public meeting calendars. The website is positioned as a trusted government portal with a focus on public service and community engagement. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including jQuery, AlpineJS, Google Tag Manager, Azure Application Insights, and an accessibility tool from AudioEye. It is built on the CivicPlus CMS platform, which is common for municipal websites. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility features, and moderate performance. However, some security best practices such as explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms could be improved. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and anti-forgery tokens in forms, indicating a baseline security posture. The integration of telemetry and accessibility tools shows a commitment to monitoring and inclusivity. The WHOIS data is incomplete or restricted, which is unusual for a .gov domain but likely due to registry policies. No signs of WAF blocking or security challenges were detected, and no vulnerabilities were apparent from the content. Overall, the website is a professional and trustworthy government resource with room for enhancement in privacy compliance and security header implementation. Strategic improvements in these areas would strengthen the site's security posture and user trust.

The security scan identified 33 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: jQuery 3.7.1, jQuery UI 1.14.1, AlpineJS 3.14.1, Google Tag Manager, Azure Application Insights, AudioEye Accessibility, CivicPlus CMS.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and business-context intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

jeffcomo.org favicon

Is jeffcomo.org Safe? Security Analysis for Jefferson County, MO

https://www.jeffcomo.org/

Check if jeffcomo.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Statesmedium
jQuery 3.7.1jQuery UI 1.14.1AlpineJS 3.14.1Google Tag ManagerAzure Application Insights+2 more
Analyzed Completed
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

Below Government avg (70)

GDPR-aligned

Data handling

EU

Hosting region

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional Report

Unlock the full report for jeffcomo.org

Professional PDF, email delivery, and optional intelligence add-ons. One-time purchase, lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

AI Summary

Jefferson County, Missouri operates an official government website providing residents and visitors with access to county news, services, departments, and community resources. The site serves as a central hub for information such as emergency alerts, tax payments, permits, employment opportunities, and public meeting calendars. The website is positioned as a trusted government portal with a focus on public service and community engagement. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including jQuery, AlpineJS, Google Tag Manager, Azure Application Insights, and an accessibility tool from AudioEye. It is built on the CivicPlus CMS platform, which is common for municipal websites. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility features, and moderate performance. However, some security best practices such as explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms could be improved. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and anti-forgery tokens in forms, indicating a baseline security posture. The integration of telemetry and accessibility tools shows a commitment to monitoring and inclusivity. The WHOIS data is incomplete or restricted, which is unusual for a .gov domain but likely due to registry policies. No signs of WAF blocking or security challenges were detected, and no vulnerabilities were apparent from the content. Overall, the website is a professional and trustworthy government resource with room for enhancement in privacy compliance and security header implementation. Strategic improvements in these areas would strengthen the site's security posture and user trust.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.7.1jQuery UI 1.14.1AlpineJS 3.14.1Google Tag ManagerAzure Application InsightsAudioEye AccessibilityCivicPlus CMS

10 urgent findings need attention

10 high

  • + 2 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep jeffcomo.org under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for jeffcomo.org.

OffSeq Observations

No critical findings yet

78/100

Email Security

4 findings

70/100

DNS Health

3 findings

75/100

SSL/TLS Security

6 findings

47/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Jefferson County's website reflects a government entity focused on delivering essential public services and information to its constituents. The site supports a broad range of county functions including emergency communications, legislative transparency, tax processing, and community engagement. The business model is service-oriented, funded by public resources, and aimed at facilitating government-citizen interactions. The website's market position is that of an official county government portal, serving a medium-sized population in Missouri. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive service offerings and integration of digital tools for accessibility and analytics. The target customer segments are residents, businesses, and visitors requiring county services or information. Partnerships with emergency services, code enforcement, and tax payment platforms are evident through linked domains. The site’s growth indicators include regular news updates, event calendars, and online service expansions. Strategic observations suggest continued investment in digital accessibility and user experience to maintain public trust and engagement.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and anti-forgery tokens implemented to protect form submissions. The use of Azure Application Insights for telemetry indicates active monitoring of site performance and errors. Accessibility integration via AudioEye reflects attention to compliance and inclusivity. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is publicly available, which could hinder transparency and rapid response to security incidents. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the content. The site lacks a cookie consent mechanism, which may impact privacy compliance, especially under GDPR or similar regulations. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a government site but would benefit from enhanced header policies and published security practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.

Observations

Comprehensive website and business-context analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Jefferson County, MO

Description:

Official government website for Jefferson County, Missouri providing county news, services, departments, and community information.

Key Services:
Online ServicesEmergency AlertsAgendas & MinutesTax PaymentsPermits & LicensesEmploymentAdopt a Pet / Lost PetRoad & Bridge ProjectsBids & RFPsSubscriptions
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.7.1jQuery UI 1.14.1AlpineJS 3.14.1Google Tag ManagerAzure Application InsightsAudioEye AccessibilityCivicPlus CMS
Frameworks:
CivicPlus CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anti-forgery tokens implemented in forms
  • Use of Azure Application Insights for telemetry
  • Accessibility tools (AudioEye) integrated

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)Azure Application Insights
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Azure Application Insights
Marketing Tools:
Azure Application Insights
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a government portal for Jefferson County, Missouri

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the jeffcomo.org security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete jeffcomo.org security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.tmes.trendmicro.com include:spf-us.tmes.trendmicro.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

47/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 56 days

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:207.38.76.12
Name Servers:
erin.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
jason.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: jcmosmtp.in.tmes.trendmicro.com
20: jeffcomo-gov.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2405160053, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:38ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.tmes.trendmicro.com include:spf-us.tmes.trendmicro.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does jeffcomo.org compare?

See how jeffcomo.org stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the CivicPlus CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and AlpineJS. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Azure Application Insights for analytics and telemetry, indicating a mature approach to monitoring and data collection. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features powered by AudioEye.
Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and deferred execution to optimize user experience. The site uses standard meta tags and structured navigation for SEO. However, the lack of explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms suggests some technical debt in security and privacy compliance.
Hosting details are not explicitly identified, and WHOIS data is incomplete, which may warrant further investigation. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a stable and user-friendly government website with opportunities for security and privacy enhancements.
Professional Report

Download the jeffcomo.org report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

Scan your own website

Liked the jeffcomo.org report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about jeffcomo.org

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website