Skip to main content

Security report for jbpussyclub.lol

Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf · Other · Iceland

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

31/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JB Pussy Club Forum is an adult-oriented online community platform primarily focused on sharing and discussing explicit video content, including amateur videos and deep fakes. The site operates as a niche forum leveraging user-generated content and affiliate marketing through adult content partnerships. The business model centers on community engagement and monetization via advertising and affiliate links to adult entertainment services. The domain is privacy-protected and relatively new, indicating a startup or recently launched platform.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jbpussyclub.lol

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
31

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The forum targets adult users interested in explicit video content, offering secret areas and password-protected downloads. Its market position is niche with a small but active user base, as evidenced by hundreds of users online and significant post counts. The site relies on affiliate partnerships with multiple adult content providers, which suggests revenue streams from referral commissions. The lack of transparent business information and reliance on privacy protection is typical in adult content sectors to protect operator anonymity.

Security posture

The website exhibits a low security maturity level. It lacks HTTPS, exposing users to potential interception risks. No security headers are implemented, and multiple third-party tracking scripts are embedded without visible consent mechanisms, raising privacy concerns. The domain uses privacy protection, which is common but reduces transparency. The site exposes session keys in client-side scripts, which could be exploited. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires significant improvements to protect user data and privacy.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Audit and minimize third-party tracking scripts; implement user consent mechanisms for cookies and tracking.
  5. Avoid exposing sensitive tokens or session keys in client-side code to prevent session hijacking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf
Description
Online forum focused on sharing and watching adult videos, specifically amateur and other explicit content. The site offers video sharing, secret area access, and links to external galleries and password-protected files.
Key services
Video sharing, Forum discussions, Access to secret areas with downloads, Affiliate links to adult content sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
MyBB, jQuery, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
MyBB
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
whos.amung.us, supercounters.com
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Supercounters.com
Tracking pixels
tynt.com, whos.amung.us, dtscout.com, supercounters.com, waust.at
Marketing tools
Supercounters.com, tynt.com, whos.amung.us
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content forum using MyBB software.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page.
  3. No HTTPS detected; all resources loaded over HTTP.
  4. Multiple third-party tracking and advertising scripts present.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security measures.
  6. Domain WHOIS is privacy protected with recent creation date.
  7. Content is explicit adult material without age verification.
  8. Contact available only via contact form and login modal; no direct emails or phone numbers.
  9. Website performance and design are basic with moderate mobile optimization.
Technical notes

Notes

The site is built on the MyBB forum platform using jQuery and standard JavaScript/CSS. Hosting is provided by qloudhost.com on shared servers. The site loads resources over HTTP, lacks modern security configurations, and includes multiple external scripts for tracking and advertising. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO is basic with minimal meta tags and no structured data. The technical infrastructure is functional but outdated and insecure, requiring modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jbpussyclub.lol. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jbpussyclub.lol.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.