Skip to main content

Security report for jbeliteservices.co.uk

JB Elite · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JB Elite is a UK-based specialist company providing commercial and domestic swimming pool services including construction, maintenance, refurbishment, and automation. Established in 2013 by experienced engineers, the company holds industry certifications and multiple awards, positioning itself as a trusted provider in the East and West Midlands regions. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, featuring clear navigation, responsive design, and SEO optimization. Technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies and integration with third-party services such as CallRail for tracking. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, though improvements are recommended in security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data due to domain naming rules violation introduces some trust concerns, but the overall business credibility remains high based on content and trust signals. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security policies, publishing incident response information, and improving privacy compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jbeliteservices.co.uk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JB Elite operates in the niche market of swimming pool services, targeting both commercial and domestic clients primarily in the UK Midlands. Their business model focuses on end-to-end pool solutions from design and build to maintenance and automation, leveraging partnerships such as with Loxone for smart home integration. The company demonstrates growth and market recognition through awards and certifications, supported by positive customer testimonials. Revenue streams likely include service contracts, product sales, and installation fees. The company maintains a professional digital presence with active social media channels and a comprehensive website. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent small business operation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and secure form handling, reflecting a baseline security maturity. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies indicate room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via a privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing. The WHOIS data anomaly reduces overall trust and suggests the need for domain registration review. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure practices are not evident, which could impact risk management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website to demonstrate security governance and readiness.
  4. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Review domain registration details and resolve WHOIS inconsistencies to improve trust and legitimacy perception.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
JB Elite
Registration number
08501872
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JB Elite
Description
Providers of Swimming Pool Services based in the East and West Midlands, servicing commercial and domestic clients with pool builds, maintenance, refurbishment, and automation.
Key services
Pool Builds and Design, Pool Maintenance, Pool Refurbishments, Swimming Pool Liners, Swimming Pool Covers, Filter Service, Heating & Ventilation, Energy Saving, Automation (Loxone partner), Pool Leak Finding
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Bootstrap, jQuery, Owl Carousel, 3D Viewer Plugin, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure contact forms with required fields
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
CallRail
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CallRail
Marketing tools
CallRail
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming rules violation error.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies.
  4. Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected.
  6. Contact information includes phone number and contact form but no email addresses explicitly found.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  8. Business is small, UK-based swimming pool service provider with awards and certifications.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  10. Tracking via CallRail is present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and uses Bootstrap framework for responsive design. It integrates several JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Owl Carousel for UI components and animations. SEO is enhanced via Yoast SEO plugin and structured data is implemented using JSON-LD for organization schema. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and optimized images, though some technical debt is noted in missing security headers and cookie consent. The site is mobile optimized and accessible at a basic level. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional web presence but could benefit from security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jbeliteservices.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jbeliteservices.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.