Skip to main content

Security report for jaycom.se

Jaycom · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jaycom is a Swedish SaaS provider specializing in comprehensive software solutions for the insurance industry, offering products such as Leo (a CRM for insurance brokers) and Focus (an insurance system for life and property insurance). The company has been operating since 2001, targeting insurance brokers and companies with tailored digital tools. The website reflects a small but focused business with consistent branding and relevant content for its niche market. Technically, the site uses a custom CMS with standard web technologies like JavaScript and CSS, and it is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, indicating a secure connection. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for GDPR compliance and enhanced security posture. The absence of WHOIS data for the queried domain raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, though the website content and business information appear legitimate. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate digital maturity with room for improvement in privacy compliance, security best practices, and richer business information disclosure.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jaycom.se

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
40
Email security
100
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jaycom.se, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
6
Employees
0
Customers
6
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
50%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for jaycom.se.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jaycom operates in the technology sector with a focus on finance/insurance SaaS solutions. Its business model revolves around providing cloud-based software to insurance brokers and companies, with key services including CRM and insurance management systems. The company appears to have a stable market position as a niche provider since 2001, serving a Swedish audience. The partnership with Leosys.se suggests a collaborative ecosystem. Revenue streams likely come from SaaS subscriptions or licenses. The website's minimal content and lack of extensive marketing tools indicate a focused but modest digital presence. No social media or extensive contact details limit outreach and customer engagement visibility. The company is small-sized with consistent branding but limited trust signals such as certifications or testimonials.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response policies, or security contact information are published, which limits transparency and preparedness. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy compliance indicators suggests potential GDPR compliance gaps. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve defense against web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and clearly document cookie usage to comply with GDPR requirements.
  3. Publish a detailed privacy policy and security incident response plan accessible from the website footer.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jaycom
Description
Heltäckande SaaS-lösningar för försäkringsbranschen sedan 2001. Offers complete CRM and insurance systems for insurance brokers and life/property insurance.
Key services
Leo - CRM for insurance brokers, Focus - Insurance system for Life and Property insurance
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no WAF blocking.
  2. WHOIS data for the queried domain 'www.jaycom.se' is missing, likely due to querying a subdomain instead of the root domain 'jaycom.se'.
  3. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  4. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected despite GDPR relevance.
  5. Contact email info@jaycom.se is present but no phone or physical address found.
  6. No social media links or security policies published.
  7. Website content is minimal but relevant to insurance SaaS solutions.
  8. Technical stack is basic with custom CMS and standard JS/CSS.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  10. No security headers detected in provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS with JavaScript and CSS libraries loaded from local 'dist' directories, indicating a self-managed infrastructure. The HTML is well-structured with meta tags for viewport and language, but lacks Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data for enhanced SEO and social sharing. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or CDN usage. Mobile optimization is basic, with viewport meta tag present but no advanced responsive design features detected. Accessibility features are minimal, with no ARIA roles or landmarks identified. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, which reduces privacy concerns but also limits marketing insights. The absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider and CMS vendor details are not disclosed, limiting infrastructure transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jaycom.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jaycom.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.