Skip to main content

Security report for javab.cz

Matcha DEMO · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

JAVAB.cz is a Czech manufacturing company specializing in custom interior doors, door frames, and professional flooring installation. The company emphasizes its Czech heritage and tradition, offering bespoke solutions for residential, commercial, and public sector interiors. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with sister companies JFD and Grena, indicating a broader business group presence. The business model focuses on direct sales with options for installment payments, targeting domestic and commercial customers in the Czech Republic. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and several modern plugins such as WP Rocket for performance optimization and Complianz for GDPR compliance. It employs Google Fonts and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form security. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, with good accessibility features and fast loading times. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Cookie consent management is implemented in compliance with GDPR. However, explicit security headers are not fully confirmed, and no public security policy or incident response information is available. The absence of WHOIS registration data reduces the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, though the website content and business presence appear professional and trustworthy. Overall, JAVAB.cz presents a solid digital presence with good content quality and technical implementation. Strategic improvements in security policy transparency and domain registration visibility would enhance trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching javab.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

JAVAB.cz operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on custom interior doors and flooring solutions. The company leverages its Czech origin as a competitive advantage and maintains a diversified product portfolio including various door types and renovation services. The presence of sister companies JFD and Grena suggests a collaborative ecosystem enhancing market reach. The business model includes direct customer engagement through a professional website with contact forms and installment payment options, indicating customer-centric sales strategies. The company targets residential, commercial, and public sector clients, reflecting a broad market segment. The website's SEO and marketing integrations indicate active digital marketing efforts to sustain growth and visibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and the use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect user input forms. Cookie consent is managed via a GDPR-compliant plugin, ensuring user privacy preferences are respected. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting transparency in incident response. The lack of WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site follows basic security best practices but would benefit from enhanced header policies and published security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file and a vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Improve domain registration visibility by ensuring WHOIS data is available and consistent with business information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Matcha DEMO
Description
Ryze český výrobek. Vyrůstáme z tradice . Zakázková výroba atypických interiérových dveří a zárubní se všemi povrchy. Rychlost dodávky. Profesionální pokládky podlah.
Key services
Custom interior doors, Door frames, Flooring installation, Renovation services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Fonts, Google reCAPTCHA v3, WP Rocket, Complianz GDPR plugin
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Sklik, Facebook
Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to manufacturing sector.
  3. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with visible consent management.
  4. Multiple sister companies linked, indicating a broader business group.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and contact form.
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with Elementor page builder, enabling flexible and responsive design. Performance optimizations are implemented using WP Rocket, and fonts are loaded via Google Fonts with preconnect hints. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection on forms and integrates multiple SEO and analytics tools including Rank Math SEO and Google Analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and clear navigation. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and performant user experience with room for enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with javab.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review javab.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.