Skip to main content

Security report for jasknihy.cz

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website jasknihy.cz is currently a parked domain landing page primarily serving advertisements and offering the domain for sale. There is no active business content or services presented, and no contact or company information is available. The technical infrastructure relies on standard HTML and JavaScript with multiple third-party ad and tracking scripts, including Google Adsense and Youseasky. The site lacks modern security practices such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers, and there is no visible privacy or cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data indicates the domain is newly created with a suspicious future creation date and uses parking name servers, suggesting it is not actively used by a legitimate business. Overall, the site has a low trustworthiness and business credibility score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jasknihy.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain appears to be held for resale or parking purposes, with no clear business operations or market positioning. There are no identifiable revenue streams beyond advertising. The lack of company information, contact details, or social media presence indicates minimal business maturity or market engagement. The domain's future creation date in WHOIS and use of parking name servers further support the conclusion that this is not an active commercial entity. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident.

Security posture

Security posture is weak due to absence of HTTPS confirmation, lack of security headers, and extensive use of third-party tracking scripts without visible user consent. No incident response or security policies are disclosed. The site is vulnerable to privacy compliance issues and lacks transparency in data collection. No known vulnerabilities are directly observable from the content, but the overall security hygiene is poor.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Add and clearly display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Provide clear business contact information to improve credibility and trust.
  4. Reduce or disclose third-party tracking and advertising scripts to enhance privacy transparency.
  5. Regularly audit WHOIS data and domain registration details to ensure consistency and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
This website appears to be a domain parking or domain for sale landing page with no active business content.
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, JavaScript, Google Adsense Domains CAF, Google Ad Services, Cloudfront CDN
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, Google Ad Services, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Google Adsense Domains CAF, Youseasky tracking scripts
Marketing tools
Google Adsense, Youseasky
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain landing page with ads and domain sale offer
  2. No active business content or services offered
  3. No contact information or company details provided
  4. Heavy use of third-party ad and tracking scripts
  5. No privacy or cookie consent mechanisms observed
  6. No security headers or HTTPS confirmation in provided data
  7. WHOIS data indicates domain parking with future creation date, suspicious
  8. No social media or external business links found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and JavaScript with external scripts for advertising and tracking. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudfront CDN for content delivery. There is no detected CMS or advanced framework. Performance is moderate but limited by ad scripts. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced SEO or structured data present. The site is minimalistic and serves primarily as a placeholder with ads, indicating technical debt and lack of modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jasknihy.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jasknihy.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.