Skip to main content

Security report for jaroona.com

Jaroona · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jaroona is a small technology company specializing in AI and Machine Learning solutions aimed at transforming raw data into actionable business intelligence. Their offerings include predictive analytics, natural language processing, computer vision, reinforcement learning, anomaly detection, and custom AI model development. The company targets businesses seeking to leverage AI for automation, fraud detection, and personalized customer experiences. The website is professionally designed using the Contao CMS and hosted by IONOS SE, but suffers from critical security shortcomings due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support. While security headers are implemented, the lack of TLS protocols and proper SSL configuration significantly lowers the security posture. Privacy and cookie policies exist but are basic, and no explicit terms of service or incident response policies are present. Contact information is limited to a contact form with no direct emails or phone numbers provided. Overall, the domain registration is mature and consistent with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Strategic improvements in SSL/TLS deployment and enhanced privacy compliance are recommended to improve trust and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jaroona.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
85
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Jaroona operates in the niche AI/ML technology sector with a focus on enterprise and blockchain security applications. Their business model is B2B, providing end-to-end AI solutions from data collection to model deployment. The company emphasizes expert AI engineers and a business-centric approach to maximize ROI for clients. Market positioning is that of a specialized AI solution provider with a growing portfolio of machine learning capabilities. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a moderate level of trustworthiness. The absence of direct contact details and limited transparency on certifications or security policies may impact credibility with cautious clients. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the domain or website content.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS, which is a critical issue. Although several security headers are implemented, the failure to enable TLS protocols and session resumption mechanisms exposes the site to potential risks. The content security policy is well-defined, which helps mitigate cross-site scripting risks. No known vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed or POODLE were detected. The site lacks incident response contact channels and vulnerability disclosure policies, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is low and requires urgent improvements to meet industry best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and properly configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated protocols.
  3. Enhance the HSTS policy by including subdomains and applying for preload status.
  4. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  5. Publish clear terms of service, security policies, and incident response procedures on the website.
  6. Provide direct contact information such as company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
  7. Expand privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data retention policies.
  8. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize privacy risks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Contao Open Source CMS and served by an Apache server hosted by IONOS SE. It uses jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking. The site includes responsive design elements and basic accessibility features. However, performance metrics indicate slow loading times with zero resource and page size data, suggesting incomplete or unmeasured performance. The absence of HTTPS and TLS protocols is a significant technical deficiency. The site uses a well-structured content security policy and standard security headers, but lacks advanced security features such as certificate transparency and OCSP stapling. The technical stack is modern but requires urgent security upgrades and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jaroona.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jaroona.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.