Skip to main content

Security report for jardins-folies-siffait.fr

Loire-Atlantique Département · Government · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website jardins-folies-siffait.fr represents the gardens of the Folies Siffait, a heritage site managed by the Loire-Atlantique department in France. It serves as an informational portal for visitors and cultural enthusiasts, offering practical information, virtual tours, and links to related patrimonial sites. The site targets a general audience interested in cultural heritage and tourism. The business model is public sector focused, promoting regional heritage and tourism. Technically, the website is built on the Jalios JCMS platform and integrates modern tools such as Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and performance insights. It employs a cookie consent management system (Orejime) ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and well-structured, providing a good user experience. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks explicit security headers and does not provide visible security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification but the official branding and content strongly suggest a legitimate government-managed site. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy standards, suitable for its public heritage promotion purpose. Strategic improvements include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jardins-folies-siffait.fr

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website is positioned as a regional government heritage site portal under the Loire-Atlantique department. It leverages partnerships with other patrimonial sites to enhance cultural tourism offerings. The business model is informational and promotional, targeting tourists and cultural heritage audiences. The site demonstrates consistent branding and professional content, indicating a medium-sized public entity. The presence of multiple official external links and social media channels supports a well-established partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include virtual tours and digital content expansion. Revenue streams are likely public funding and tourism promotion rather than direct sales.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced with strong SSL configuration, and cookie consent is managed via a recognized tool. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. However, the absence of security headers and explicit security or incident response policies indicates room for improvement. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, which could enhance transparency and incident handling. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public informational site but could be enhanced with additional best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to inform users and stakeholders about security practices and contact points.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program, including a security.txt file, to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
  5. Enhance monitoring and validation of form inputs to prevent injection attacks and ensure data integrity.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Loire-Atlantique Département
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Loire-Atlantique Département
Description
The website presents the gardens of the Folies Siffait, a heritage site managed by the Loire-Atlantique department. It provides information about the gardens, practical information, virtual visits, and related patrimonial sites.
Key services
Information about the gardens, Virtual garden visits, Practical visitor information, Promotion of related patrimonial sites
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Jalios JCMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Orejime cookie manager, Swiper carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and good mobile optimization.
  3. Strong focus on cultural heritage and public information.
  4. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with user consent mechanisms.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, limiting domain trust verification.
  7. Multiple official external links to related heritage and government sites.
  8. Use of modern analytics and cookie management tools.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Jalios JCMS, a content management system tailored for public sector use. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for analytics and tracking. The use of Orejime for cookie consent management reflects attention to privacy compliance. The site employs responsive design and accessibility features, providing a good user experience across devices. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from additional security hardening measures. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the site's informational and promotional goals effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jardins-folies-siffait.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jardins-folies-siffait.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.