Skip to main content

Security report for jardinesjoinery.com

Jardine’s Joinery (Wirral) Ltd · Manufacturing · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jardine’s Joinery (Wirral) Ltd is a small bespoke joinery manufacturer specializing in high-quality staircases, windows, doors, gates, and conservatories serving the Wirral, Cheshire, and Merseyside regions. The company emphasizes craftsmanship and fine detail, positioning itself as a leading local provider in bespoke joinery. The website is built on WordPress with legacy plugins and scripts, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity but with outdated technology components. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS enforcement, missing security headers, and outdated software versions, exposing the site to potential vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further reduces compliance with modern data protection standards. Additionally, the domain WHOIS data is missing or indicates no registration, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the active website presence. Overall, the site provides good business information and contact details but requires significant improvements in security, compliance, and technical modernization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jardinesjoinery.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
27
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the manufacturing sector focused on bespoke joinery products for residential and commercial clients in a defined geographic area. Its competitive advantage lies in craftsmanship and bespoke design capabilities. The business model is service and product-based, relying on custom orders and local reputation. The website supports marketing efforts with galleries and service descriptions but lacks modern digital marketing and compliance features. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. Growth potential may be limited by the small scale and regional focus. The lack of domain registration data and outdated technology stack may impact customer trust and operational resilience.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low, with critical gaps including no HTTPS enforcement, absence of security headers, and use of outdated WordPress and jQuery versions. No incident response or security policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or data protection officer information is available. The site uses Google Analytics with legacy scripts but lacks cookie consent mechanisms, indicating poor privacy compliance. These factors expose the business to risks such as data interception, exploitation of known vulnerabilities, and regulatory non-compliance. Immediate remediation is recommended to improve security posture and protect business operations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to the latest secure versions and upgrade jQuery.
  3. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  5. Investigate and resolve domain WHOIS registration inconsistencies to ensure domain legitimacy and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Jardine’s Joinery (Wirral) Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jardine’s Joinery (Wirral) Ltd
Description
Jardine’s Joinery is an established bespoke joinery manufacturer specializing in staircases, windows, doors, period mouldings, gates, and conservatories covering Wirral, Cheshire, and Merseyside.
Key services
Staircases, Windows, Doors and Conservatories, Gates, Bespoke Projects
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.1.29, jQuery 1.11.1, Google Analytics (legacy ga.js), NextGEN Gallery plugin, Simple Nivo Slider plugin, Yoast WordPress SEO plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google Analytics by Yoast plugin with forced SSL tracking

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (legacy ga.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast WordPress SEO plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with physical address, phone, fax, and email
  4. Website uses outdated WordPress and jQuery versions, posing security risks
  5. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible in provided HTML
  6. Google Analytics tracking is implemented using legacy scripts
  7. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, inconsistent with active website
  8. No evidence of security or incident response policies
  9. No certifications or compliance badges displayed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on an outdated WordPress 4.1.29 platform with legacy plugins such as NextGEN Gallery and Simple Nivo Slider. It uses jQuery 1.11.1 and Google Analytics legacy ga.js scripts. The site lacks modern performance optimizations and mobile responsiveness is basic. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin but the version is old. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider details are evident. The site’s technical debt includes outdated software and missing security best practices, which could impact stability and security. Modernization opportunities include platform upgrade, improved mobile optimization, and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jardinesjoinery.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jardinesjoinery.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.