Skip to main content

Security report for jardasimek.cz

Jaroslav Šimek · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jarda Simek is a professional UX/UI and 3D designer based in the Czech Republic, operating primarily as an independent or freelance creative. The website serves as a portfolio showcasing a variety of projects including brand design, product design, architectural visualization, mobile app design, and cinematic intros. The business targets digital creatives and clients seeking specialized design services, positioning itself as a niche personal brand with a focus on quality and creativity. The domain age and WHOIS data align well with the business history, indicating a stable and legitimate presence since 2018. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies such as Alpine.js and the model-viewer web component for 3D content, along with Google Fonts for typography. The site is hosted likely by Wedos, a Czech hosting provider, and demonstrates good mobile optimization and user experience. However, the site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features, and no CMS or analytics tools are detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks explicit security headers and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present, reducing exposure to input-based vulnerabilities. The absence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure information suggests room for improvement in security maturity. Overall, the website is a well-designed, professional portfolio with moderate technical sophistication and business credibility. Key recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, and enhancing compliance and security posture to build greater trust and meet regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jardasimek.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small, independent design studio or freelance entity specializing in UX/UI and 3D design services. Its market positioning is focused on creative digital projects with a portfolio that includes brand campaigns, product design, architectural visualization, and cinematic intros. The business model is project-based, targeting clients in need of specialized design work. The presence of social media links and a downloadable bio PDF supports marketing and client engagement efforts. There is no indication of parent companies or subsidiaries, emphasizing a solo or small team operation. Growth indicators include a diverse project portfolio and active social media presence. The partnership ecosystem is limited to social platforms and hosting providers, with no evident commercial partnerships or payment processors.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms or user input fields are present, minimizing risks of injection or data leakage. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a portfolio site but requiring enhancements for higher trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Introduce a secure contact form with input validation to facilitate client communication.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Jaroslav Šimek
Registration number
03770958
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jaroslav Šimek
Description
Experienced UX/UI designer now moves into a 3D world
Key services
UX/UI design, 3D design, brand and product design, architectural visualization, mobile app design, cinematic intros
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Alpine.js, Google Fonts, model-viewer
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage assumed (URL is https)
  • No forms detected to collect sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Professional personal portfolio website for a UX/UI and 3D designer
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap
  3. No contact phone or physical address provided, only email
  4. No forms present on the site
  5. Social media presence is well linked and consistent
  6. Modern frontend technologies used with Alpine.js and model-viewer
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  9. No advertising or affiliate programs detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with Alpine.js providing reactive UI components and model-viewer enabling 3D model display. Google Fonts are used for typography, enhancing visual appeal. The site is hosted by Wedos, a Czech provider, consistent with the domain registration. Performance is moderate with no heavy analytics or advertising scripts detected, contributing to faster load times. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive CSS and viewport meta tags. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes. SEO optimization is basic, relying on meta tags and Open Graph data but lacking structured data like JSON-LD. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a portfolio site but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jardasimek.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jardasimek.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.