Skip to main content

Security report for janske-lazne.cz

Město Janské Lázně · Government · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Město Janské Lázně operates an official municipal website serving the town of Janské Lázně in the Czech Republic. The site provides comprehensive information for residents and visitors including municipal news, public procurement, event calendars, and contact details. The business model is focused on public service and local government communication, positioning itself as the authoritative source for town-related information. The website targets a general audience including local citizens and tourists. Technically, the website employs a modern frontend stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, and Ionicons, likely running on the Umbraco CMS platform. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate with standard web technologies and no heavy tracking or advertising scripts detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and does not provide explicit incident response or security policies. No cookie consent mechanism was found, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, reflecting a legitimate municipal entity with a long-established domain. Strategic improvements include implementing cookie consent, enhancing security headers, and publishing security policies to strengthen compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching janske-lazne.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention janske-lazne.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for janske-lazne.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a small government entity focused on municipal services and local tourism promotion. Its market position is stable as the official town portal, providing essential public information and services. The business model is non-commercial, funded by public resources, with key services including public notices, event management, and administrative contacts. The site supports local partnerships with tourism, education, and government portals, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators are limited given the municipal nature, but the site maintains relevance through updated content and event promotion.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, but the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No dedicated security or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism may expose the site to regulatory scrutiny under GDPR. No known vulnerabilities or sensitive data leaks were found. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance measures to mitigate risks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and inform users about cookie usage.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a security policy and provide a dedicated contact for incident response or vulnerability reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party libraries and update them to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by linking privacy and terms of service documents prominently.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MĚSTO JANSKÉ LÁZNĚ
VAT number
CZ00277967
Registration number
00277967
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Město Janské Lázně
Description
Internetová prezentace krkonošského města Janské Lázně
Key services
Municipal information, Public notices and updates, Event calendar, Public procurement information, Contact and office hours, Visitor information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Ionicons
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (inferred from URL https://janske-lazne.cz/)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form with GET method for search

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official municipal website for Janské Lázně town in Czech Republic
  2. Content is comprehensive for local government and visitor information
  3. No privacy or cookie banner detected, potential GDPR compliance gap
  4. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure
  5. No email addresses explicitly listed in the HTML content
  6. Contact information limited to physical address and office hours
  7. No phone numbers or emails explicitly labeled as contact found
  8. Uses modern frontend libraries and frameworks
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected
  10. Social media presence limited to Facebook with no other platforms linked
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, and Ionicons for frontend functionality and styling, indicating a mature but somewhat traditional tech stack. The CMS is likely Umbraco, inferred from document references and URL patterns. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. Performance is moderate with autoplay carousels and multiple images, but no heavy analytics or advertising scripts. There is room for modernization by adopting newer frontend frameworks and improving security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with janske-lazne.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review janske-lazne.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.