Skip to main content

Security report for jamesgood.co.uk

James Good Limited · Other · United Kingdom

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

James Good Limited is a UK-based branding and marketing consultancy specializing in corporate brand strategy, identity design, copywriting, and marketing services primarily targeting B2B clients. The company positions itself as a seasoned expert partner offering strategic and pragmatic marketing leadership and consulting services. Their website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence built on Drupal 10, incorporating modern marketing analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile-optimized and provides clear navigation and comprehensive content about their services and client portfolio. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable due to a domain naming rules error, which limits domain trust verification. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital footprint with good privacy compliance and business credibility, though improvements in security posture and domain registration transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jamesgood.co.uk

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the marketing consultancy sector, focusing on B2B clients across various industries. Their business model revolves around providing advisory and implementation services in brand definition, marketing strategy, management, content creation, business development, and marketing analysis. The presence of client logos from reputable organizations and testimonials indicates a solid market position and trust. The company appears to be small-sized, founded in 2002, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. Their marketing approach leverages digital tools and analytics to optimize client outcomes. The website's comprehensive service descriptions and client references suggest a competitive advantage in strategic marketing leadership within their niche.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security represents a gap in defense-in-depth strategies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness perception. The WHOIS data unavailability raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which impacts overall trust. The site uses standard marketing and analytics scripts, which are common but require ongoing monitoring for privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for enhancement in headers and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Investigate and resolve the WHOIS domain naming error to ensure domain registration transparency and improve trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to maintain GDPR compliance and minimize privacy risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
James Good Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
James Good Limited
Description
Branding and marketing consultants specialising in corporate brand strategy, brand identity design, copywriting, marketing and website design.
Key services
Brand Definition, Marketing Strategy, Marketing Management, Brand Content, Business Development, Marketing Analysis
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Call Tracking, Cloudfront
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Marketing tools
Call Tracking
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional branding and marketing consultancy site with clear service offerings.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy implemented.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to domain naming rules error, limiting domain trust verification.
  5. Use of modern CMS (Drupal 10) and standard marketing analytics tools.
  6. No security headers detected; opportunity for security improvements.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  8. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely supported CMS, indicating a current technology stack. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and call tracking scripts for marketing analytics and performance measurement. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors or broken elements detected. The absence of hosting provider information limits infrastructure assessment. The site uses standard meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO and social media integration. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and domain registration issues represent areas for technical improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jamesgood.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jamesgood.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.