Skip to main content

Security report for jakob-schlaepfer.ch

Jakob Schlaepfer · Manufacturing · Switzerland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Jakob Schlaepfer is a Swiss-based manufacturer specializing in innovative textiles for fashion and interior decoration, targeting professionals in the textile and design industries. The company positions itself as a niche provider focusing on high-quality, creative, and design-driven textile products. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to its target audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress and uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Modernizr, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks advanced security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR indicators. Overall, the site is trustworthy and legitimate, with domain registration data consistent with the business claims.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching jakob-schlaepfer.ch

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention jakob-schlaepfer.ch, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for jakob-schlaepfer.ch right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on textiles for fashion and interior markets. Its business model revolves around producing and retailing high-quality textiles, likely serving designers and decorators. The website's content and structure suggest a small-sized enterprise with a localized Swiss presence. The partnership with SchwizerSchlatter Interaction GmbH for website design indicates a professional approach to digital presence. No evidence of extensive marketing or advertising tools was found, suggesting a focus on organic reach or direct business relationships. The absence of social media links may indicate a limited digital marketing strategy or a preference for direct client engagement. The company appears stable with consistent branding and clear contact information, supporting business credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, indicating limited transparency in security incident handling. No forms with sensitive inputs were detected, reducing immediate risk exposure. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms may pose compliance risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, formalizing incident response channels, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Consider integrating analytics and marketing tools with privacy compliance to better understand user behavior and improve business insights.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Jakob Schlaepfer
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jakob Schlaepfer
Description
Manufacturer of innovative textiles for fashion and interior decoration, meeting highest demands for creativity, design and quality
Key services
Textiles for fashion, Textiles for interior decoration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Modernizr, Respond.js, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URLs)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and branding
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms detected
  4. Contact information is present but no contact forms found in HTML
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  6. No social media links detected in the HTML content
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with common JS libraries
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected
  9. Privacy policy is present but only in German language and basic quality
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging standard JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Modernizr, and Respond.js for compatibility and responsiveness. The site uses a custom theme with CSS and JS files loaded from the same domain, indicating self-hosted assets. Performance is moderate with images optimized for various screen sizes. Mobile optimization is good, supported by responsive design meta tags and scripts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags including Open Graph for social sharing. However, no advanced frameworks or modern frontend technologies like React or Vue.js are detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the HTML content. The technical setup is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with jakob-schlaepfer.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review jakob-schlaepfer.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.